- Home
- Philadelphia, PA
- Personal Injury
- Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo, PC
Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo, PC
ListedPersonal InjuryPhiladelphia, PA● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
5Practice areas
About Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo
Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo works from Greenwood Avenue in Jenkintown, with offices in Allentown and Philadelphia, and names no attorney on the pages we could reach.
242 reviews at 4.89 across three listings. A free consultation, published. It publishes six case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
4.89 average over 242 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
40out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Pennsylvania does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
25 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (51% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by PAPennsylvania does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on the pages we could read, so there is nobody to look up. The register itself exists: Pennsylvania publishes its attorney discipline as court decisions and we read them for the other firms in this market.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by PA3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Pennsylvania publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint242 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2000-12-16, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourcePennsylvania publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes6/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted6 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted4 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience14/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved242 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.89 over 242 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-25) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle2 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them2 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 10 → 35th pct of 73-firm cohort (median 19) 1/3 · 1,366 referring domains, 66th pct 1/2 · 67 organic keywords / 344 visits·mo, 44th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness1/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Philadelphia Personal Injury (74 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
10· 35th percentile
1,366 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 18.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26Trust pages
2 / 2
blog · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 28
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26Practice areas 5 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo, PC lists 6 case results on its own website, across 4 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpractice
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 242 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Jenkintown
Jenkintown101 Greenwood Ave Ste 203, Jenkintown, PA 19046, USA
Allentown1275 Glenlivet Dr Suite 100, Allentown, PA 18106, USA
Mednick Mezyk & Kredo Injury Attorneys1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #1030, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo charge?
Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo offer a free consultation?
Yes. Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo have offices?
Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo publishes three offices, in Jenkintown, Allentown and Philadelphia. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo?
Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
Are the case results Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo publishes verified?
No. Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo publishes six case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo?
Mednick, Mezyk & Kredo scores 39 and sits at Listed. Passed: footprint. Did not pass: website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.