1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Megeredchian Law

Megeredchian Law

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 239 Google reviews2 offices11 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
6Practice areas

About Megeredchian Law

Megeredchian Law is a personal injury firm with offices in Burbank and Los Angeles.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free; its intake line is open around the clock. It publishes material in English and Spanish.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 7 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

4.78 average over 239 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

10 results published

Across 6 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

58out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar D (9/25).

LFL Verified 2026
7 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (61% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · A2 Experience: +5 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 Licensure7 of 11 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 4 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 7 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 11 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint239 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2013-09-17, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
11/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 9.7 years since admission across 7 of 11 named attorneys (longest 25, shortest 1) · NYS Attorney Registration database5 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry7 of 11 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
8/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted10 results published on the firm's own site, counted from result headings4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted6 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved239 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.78 over 239 reviews → Bayesian 4.79 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle7 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-23) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
9/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 28.0 → 74th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 2/3 · 1,460 referring domains, 79th pct 2/2 · 84 organic keywords / 565 visits·mo, 66th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
28· 73th percentile
1,460 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 4.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
3 / 3
disclaimer · privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 59
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Megeredchian Law lists 10 case results on its own website, across 6 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 7 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 4 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

AM
Alex MegeredchianAdmitted in CA
JK
John KsajikianAdmitted in CA
MZ
Monika ZahraiAdmitted in CA
MK
Michael De KruifAdmitted in CA
KG
Karin GharabighiAdmitted in CA
OZ
Orin ZahraiAdmitted in CA
EH
Edric HovssepianAdmitted in CA

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 239 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Burbank

Burbank350 N Glenoaks Blvd 3rd floor, Burbank, CA 91501, USA
Los Angeles1001 Wilshire Blvd #100, Los Angeles, CA 90017, USA