- Home
- San Diego, CA
- Personal Injury
- Moseley Collins Law, APLC
Moseley Collins Law, APLC
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Moseley Collins Law, APLC
Moseley Collins Law, APLC works from Ninth Street in Sacramento, with offices in Seattle and San Diego, and names seven attorneys.
6,132 reviews at 4.91 across three listings, the largest count of any firm listed in San Diego by a wide margin. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
6,132 client reviews
Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.91 average over 6,132 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
51out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 202614 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (49% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +8 available · B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available
G1 Licensure2 of 7 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 5 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 7 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint6,132 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2005-12-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing8/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 10.5 years since admission across 2 of 6 named attorneys (longest 12, shortest 9) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry2 of 6 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio1 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience20/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved6,132 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.91 over 6,132 reviews → Bayesian 4.91 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle15 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-26) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority11/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 52 → 99th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 3/3 · 3,849 referring domains, 100th pct 2/2 · 598 organic keywords / 6,261 visits·mo, 92th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
52· 96th percentile
3,849 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 0.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · disclaimer · privacy policy · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 38
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Attorneys 2 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 4 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
JK
John J. KinneyIii
BB
Brett BeylerAdmitted in NY
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 6,132 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Sacramento
Sacramento980 9th St 16th floor, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA
Seattle701 5th Ave Suite 4200, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
San Diego3930 Oregon St #249, San Diego, CA 92104, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Moseley Collins Law, APLC charge?
Moseley Collins Law, APLC publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Moseley Collins Law, APLC offer a free consultation?
Yes. Moseley Collins Law, APLC publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Moseley Collins Law, APLC have offices?
Moseley Collins Law, APLC publishes three offices, in Sacramento, Seattle and San Diego. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Moseley Collins Law, APLC?
Moseley Collins Law, APLC names seven attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Moseley Collins Law, APLC?
Moseley Collins Law, APLC scores 52 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.