1. Home
  2. San Diego, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Mulvaney Law

Mulvaney Law

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 116 Google reviews1 office4 attorneysEnglish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
5Practice areas

About Mulvaney Law

Mulvaney Law works from Cornerstone Court West and names four attorneys.

116 reviews at 5.0. A free consultation, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

5 average over 116 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

35out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
30 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (49% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: D2 Search authority: +7 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 Licensure2 of 4 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 2 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 4 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint116 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2019-05-03, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
10/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 12.5 years since admission across 2 of 4 named attorneys (longest 17, shortest 8) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry2 of 4 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved116 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 116 reviews → Bayesian 4.92 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-09) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
2/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm0.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 9 → 38th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 1/3 · 831 referring domains, 22th pct 0/2 · 3 organic keywords / 4 visits·mo, 17th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)1 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 0 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30no JSON-LD detected 0/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)0 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
1/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
9· 37th percentile
831 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 19.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
2 / 2
privacy policy · attorney bios
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 35
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30

Practice areas 5 areas · primary focus highlighted

Attorneys 2 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 2 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

CM
Conor MulvaneyAdmitted in NY
EF
Elizabeth “Lisa” FowlerAdmitted in NY

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 116 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: San Diego

San Diego6046 Cornerstone Ct W #218, San Diego, CA 92121, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Mulvaney Law charge?
Mulvaney Law publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Mulvaney Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. Mulvaney Law publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Mulvaney Law have offices?
Mulvaney Law publishes one office, in San Diego. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Mulvaney Law?
Mulvaney Law names four attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Mulvaney Law?
Mulvaney Law scores 29 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.