1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Novian & Novian, LLP

Novian & Novian, LLP

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.3 · 42 Google reviews1 office21 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
4Practice areas

About Novian & Novian

Novian & Novian, LLP is a personal injury firm with a single office in Los Angeles.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

44out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
21 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (44% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available
G1 Licensure16 of 22 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 6 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordNo disciplinary record is held against any of the 16 attorneys we identified. Andrew Goodman could not be told apart from 5 namesakes, one of whom is not eligible to practise. Held open.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 23 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint42 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2000-06-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
10/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 14.6 years since admission across 16 of 21 named attorneys (longest 42, shortest 2) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry16 of 21 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
15/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved42 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.3 over 42 reviews → Bayesian 4.67 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle3 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-05-08) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 30.0 → 80th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 2/3 · 1,440 referring domains, 77th pct 2/2 · 655 organic keywords / 4,238 visits·mo, 93th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
3/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
30· 79th percentile
1,440 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 3.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · privacy policy · disclaimer · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 80
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Practice areas 4 areas · primary focus highlighted

Personal InjuryCar AccidentsWrongful DeathSlip and Fall

Attorneys 18 attorneys · 16 of 18 licences checked against the California attorney register · 3 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

CC
Century CityCa Personal Injury Attorney
MB
Manhattan BeachCa Personal Injury Attorney
FN
Farhad NovianAdmitted in CA
FN
Farid NovianAdmitted in CA
MN
Matthew Joseph NovianAdmitted in CA
SB
Sean BozarthAdmitted in CA
AK
Alexander KandelAdmitted in CA
SR
Sharon RaminfardAdmitted in CA
PR
Paul RogoffAdmitted in CA
AR
Amanda RussoAdmitted in CA
LW
Lauren WoodlandAdmitted in CA
AC
Anthony ChavezAdmitted in CA
JV
Jamie VogelAdmitted in CA
CF
Cody FisherAdmitted in CA
YN
Yasmine NovianAdmitted in CA
BS
Brandon SadighAdmitted in CA
JW
Jennifer WeinerAdmitted in CA
TY
Thomas YauAdmitted in CA

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.3
★★★★★
Based on 42 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Los Angeles

Los Angeles1801 Century Pk E, Los Angeles, CA 90067, USA