- Home
- Las Vegas, NV
- Personal Injury
- Oronoz & Ericsson, LLC
Oronoz & Ericsson, LLC
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLas Vegas, NV● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
7Practice areas
About Oronoz & Ericsson
Oronoz & Ericsson works from Covington Cross Drive and names three attorneys.
30 reviews at 5.0. A free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes nine case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Nevada on the discipline of State Bar of Nevada members, 1992 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
47out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Nevada does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Verified 202618 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (55% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by NVNevada does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Nevada on the discipline of State Bar of Nevada members, 1992 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by NV1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Nevada publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 2 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint30 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2014-10-28, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceNevada publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceNevada publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, American Association for Justice · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes6/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted9 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted4 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience12/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved30 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 30 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2025-10-15) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review1 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 14 → 40th pct of 83-firm cohort (median 19) 1/3 · 958 referring domains, 36th pct 1/2 · 63 organic keywords / 167 visits·mo, 49th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness5/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Las Vegas Personal Injury (84 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
14· 40th percentile
958 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 12.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26Trust pages
2 / 2
blog · attorney bios
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 86
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26Practice areas 7 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Oronoz & Ericsson, LLC lists 9 case results on its own website, across 4 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckwrongful deathpedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 2 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Nevada attorney register
JO
James OronozAttorney
TE
Thomas EricssonAttorney
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 30 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Las Vegas
Las Vegas9900 Covington Cross Dr Suite 290, Las Vegas, NV 89144, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Oronoz & Ericsson charge?
Oronoz & Ericsson publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Oronoz & Ericsson offer a free consultation?
Yes. Oronoz & Ericsson publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Oronoz & Ericsson have offices?
Oronoz & Ericsson publishes one office, in Las Vegas. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Oronoz & Ericsson?
Oronoz & Ericsson names three attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Nevada does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Oronoz & Ericsson publishes verified?
No. Oronoz & Ericsson publishes nine case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Oronoz & Ericsson?
Oronoz & Ericsson scores 48 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.