1. Home
  2. Phoenix, AZ
  3. Personal Injury
  4. O'Steen MacLeod Combs PLC

O'Steen MacLeod Combs PLC

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhoenix, AZ● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 117 Google reviews3 offices16 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
5Practice areas

About O'Steen MacLeod Combs PLC

O'Steen MacLeod Combs works from West Clarendon Avenue in Phoenix, with offices in Prescott and Payson, and names 19 attorneys.

117 reviews at 4.87 across three listings. A free consultation and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

4.87 average over 117 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

34out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Arizona does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
31 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (38% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by AZArizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by AZArizona does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by AZ3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Arizona publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 19 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint117 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2024-11-02, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
14/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved117 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.87 over 117 reviews → Bayesian 4.85 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle3 of 11 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-25) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 11 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 8 → 35th pct of 100-firm cohort (median 16) 1/3 · 939 referring domains, 42th pct 1/2 · 173 organic keywords / 346 visits·mo, 62th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
2/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Phoenix Personal Injury (101 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
8· 35th percentile
939 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 20.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
2 / 2
blog · attorney bios
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 38
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30

Practice areas 5 areas · primary focus highlighted

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 16 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 117 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 3 locations · main office: Phoenix

Phoenix300 W Clarendon Ave #400, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
Prescott136 Grove Ave Ste 104, Prescott, AZ 86301, USA
Payson630 AZ-260, Payson, AZ 85541, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does O'Steen MacLeod Combs charge?
O'Steen MacLeod Combs publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does O'Steen MacLeod Combs offer a free consultation?
Yes. O'Steen MacLeod Combs publishes a free initial consultation. It publishes material in Spanish.
Where does O'Steen MacLeod Combs have offices?
O'Steen MacLeod Combs publishes three offices, in Phoenix, Prescott and Payson. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at O'Steen MacLeod Combs?
O'Steen MacLeod Combs names 19 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Arizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about O'Steen MacLeod Combs?
O'Steen MacLeod Combs scores 33 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.