LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★5.0 · 107 Google reviews1 office12 attorneysEnglish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Parker Scheer
Parker Scheer works from Center Plaza and names twelve people, including both partners in its name. It publishes every trust page pillar D looks for.
Its Google listing averages a flat five stars across 107 reviews. It states no fee model in terms we could record, and its site is among the slowest in this market on Core Web Vitals.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
5 average over 107 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
46out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 63 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillars A and B in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (91% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · B1 Results published: not yet measured (6 pts) · B2 Specificity: not yet measured (5 pts)
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 12 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint107 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 1996-06-17, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing
3/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice, Association of Trial Lawyers of America, New York State Bar Association and 2 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedPendingthe results page served 5215 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 6
B2 SpecificityPendingthe results page served 5215 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 5
B3 Results disclosurePendingthe results page served 5215 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 4
CClient Experience
18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved107 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 107 reviews → Bayesian 4.91 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-23) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 12 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Eric J. Parker
Shannon MacDonald
Amanda M. Frederick
Lawrence “Lonnie” Murray
Susan Bourque
Barry Scheer
Heather Boutet
Emma Farhart
Nicole Hadaya
Amanda Benjamin
Parker Scheer
Alex Dionne
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 107 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm