- Home
- San Antonio, TX
- Personal Injury
- Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney
Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Antonio, TX● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
5Practice areas
About Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney
Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney works from East Commerce Street and names four attorneys.
111 reviews at 4.7. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes 28 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
4.7 average over 111 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
28 results published
Across 7 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
60out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 20265 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (70% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +4.0 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity on the Texas list of active franchise taxpayers. Texas does not require a sole proprietorship or a general partnership to pay franchise tax, and an exempt entity is left off as well, so this is a check this source cannot complete rather than evidence against the firm. The state's own SOSDirect service can settle it for a fee
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published, and 1 more person in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint111 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2002-04-07, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes13/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted28 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience14/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved111 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.7 over 111 reviews → Bayesian 4.76 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle1 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-03-18) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 19 → 56th pct of 63-firm cohort (median 17.5) 2/3 · 708 referring domains, 8th pct 0/2 · 194 organic keywords / 3,417 visits·mo, 77th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Antonio Personal Injury (64 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
19· 56th percentile
708 ref. domains · cohort median 17.5 · Ahrefs rank 9.2M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
1 / 1
blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 74
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-29Practice areas 5 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney lists 28 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 1 attorney · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Texas attorney register · 1 person is named in a role that is not a lawyer’s
PJ
Pat Maloney Jr.Partner
Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s
The firm names this person among its team and prints the role below beside the name. They are not counted as attorneys.
- Steve Lubbering Client Intake Specialist
Client reviews
4.7
★★★★★
Based on 111 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: San Antonio
San Antonio239 E Commerce St, San Antonio, TX 78205, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney charge?
Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney offer a free consultation?
Yes. Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney have offices?
Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney publishes one office, in San Antonio. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney?
Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney names four attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney publishes verified?
No. Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney publishes 28 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney?
Pat Maloney: Accident & Injury Attorney scores 58 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.