- Home
- Buffalo, NY
- Family Law
- Paul Walier Attorneys at Law
Paul Walier Attorneys at Law
ListedFamily LawBuffalo, NY● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
PaidInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Paul Walier Attorneys at Law
Paul Walier Attorneys at Law works from Abbott Road in South Buffalo and holds 407 reviews at 4.6, which is five times the next largest count in this ranking and the reason a divorce search in Buffalo returns it first. Its site presents family law, divorce and bankruptcy together on its front door.
It names no individual lawyer anywhere on its site, which is unusual for a firm carrying somebody's name, and it is one of two firms here that publish no roster at all. It explains three stages of a matrimonial case and offers a contested and an uncontested route. It publishes no rate, no retainer figure and no flat fee.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
408 client reviews
Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
36out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
29 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (53% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Fee terms published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on its public pages, so there is no roster whose licensure can be checked. The register is open and free to search; the names are what is missing.
G2 DisciplineNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on its public pages, so there is no roster whose disciplinary history can be checked. The register is open and free to search; the names are what is missing.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity found in the active corporations register. New York does not require a general partnership to file with the Department of State, so this is not evidence against the firm, only a check we could not complete from this source
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint408 public client reviews and 8 years since its web address was registered in 2018
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is no admission year to establish for anybody. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes4/15
B1 Fee terms publishedFirm-submittedNothing about the rate, the retainer or any other price on the 2 pages we read. The court rules guarantee a client all of it in a signed agreement before the work starts; publishing it beforehand is the firm's choice0 / 6
B2 The case explainedFirm-submittedExplains 3 stages of a matrimonial case: child support, discovery, maintenance · names litigation, uncontested4 / 5
B3 Billing and the retainer disclosedFirm-submittedSays nothing about how it bills against the retainer or what happens to the unused part, on any of the 2 pages we read0 / 4
CClient Experience16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved408 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.6 over 408 reviews → Bayesian 4.64 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-05) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them2 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority4/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-18DR 0.2 → 13th pct of 23-firm cohort (median 2.2) 0/3 · 431 referring domains, 30th pct 1/2 · 15 organic keywords / 18 visits·mo, 62th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 2 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.2 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-18JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness0/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedfee model not published · the rate, retainer or flat fee itself is not published0 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Buffalo × Family Law (24 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
0.2· 13th percentile
431 ref. domains · cohort median 2.2 · Ahrefs rank 75.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-18Trust pages
1 / 1
blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 54
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-18Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Client reviews
4.6
★★★★★
Based on 408 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Buffalo
Buffalo1369 Abbott Rd, Buffalo, NY 14218, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Paul Walier Attorneys at Law charge?
Paul Walier Attorneys at Law publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee.
Does Paul Walier Attorneys at Law offer a free consultation?
Paul Walier Attorneys at Law does not publish a free consultation on the pages we read. That is not the same as charging for one, and it is worth asking.
Where does Paul Walier Attorneys at Law have offices?
Paul Walier Attorneys at Law publishes one office, in Buffalo. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Paul Walier Attorneys at Law?
Paul Walier Attorneys at Law names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Paul Walier Attorneys at Law?
Paul Walier Attorneys at Law scores 35 and sits at Listed. Passed: footprint. Did not pass: entity registration and website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.