- Home
- San Diego, CA
- Personal Injury
- Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers
Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers
Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers works from Civic Center Drive in Oceanside, with a second office in Vista, and names a single attorney.
37 reviews at 5.0 across two listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published. It publishes 13 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 1 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
13 results published
Across 5 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
19 years average at the bar
Mean 19.0 years since admission across 1 of 1 named attorneys (longest 19, shortest 19) · NYS Attorney Registration database
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
55out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: A; most headroom in pillar D (8/25).
LFL Verified 202610 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (61% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: D2 Search authority: +5 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available · C3 Review recency: +4 available
G1 Licensure1 of 1 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 1 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published.
G6 Footprint37 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2014-05-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing15/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 19.0 years since admission across 1 of 1 named attorneys (longest 19, shortest 19) · NYS Attorney Registration database9 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry1 of 1 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio6 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes8/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted13 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted5 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience12/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved37 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 37 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle1 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2025-12-16) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review1 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 11 → 44th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 1/3 · 850 referring domains, 31th pct 1/2 · 79 organic keywords / 346 visits·mo, 58th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
11· 43th percentile
850 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 16.0M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
5 / 5
privacy policy · fee statement · disclaimer · attorney bios · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 74
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers lists 13 case results on its own website, across 5 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathpedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 1 attorney · every licence checked against the California attorney register
DP
Daniel PetrovAdmitted in NY
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 37 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: Oceanside
Oceanside702 Civic Center Dr Ste 105, Oceanside, CA 92054, USA
Vista380 S Melrose Dr Suite 124, Vista, CA 92081, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers charge?
Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers offer a free consultation?
Yes. Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers have offices?
Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers publishes two offices, in Oceanside and Vista. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers?
Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers names one attorney on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers publishes verified?
No. Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers publishes 13 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers?
Petrov Personal Injury Lawyers scores 49 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.