1. Home
  2. Baltimore, MD
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Portner & Shure, P.A.

Portner & Shure, P.A.

LFL Certified 2026 · Score 69Personal InjuryBaltimore, MD● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 1,820 Google reviews15 offices39 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
9Practice areas

About Portner & Shure, P.A.

Portner & Shure works from 15 offices across Maryland, Virginia and Washington DC, and names 39 attorneys, the largest roster of any firm listed in Baltimore.

1,820 reviews at 4.78 across 15 listings. A free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes 13 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Certified 2026

Scored 69 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2614 published discipline decisions of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, 1976 to 2026. 3 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

1,820 client reviews

Counted across 15 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.78 average over 1,820 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

13 results published

Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

69out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Maryland does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

LFL Certified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 2026
9 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (83% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MDMaryland does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2614 published discipline decisions of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, 1976 to 2026. 3 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MD15 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Maryland publishes no business register we can query. SDAT's entity search is a form rather than a dataset, its bulk data is sold rather than published, and the state's open data portal carries a count of businesses instead of the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 39 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint2,131 public client reviews across 15 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2003-10-15, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceMaryland publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMaryland publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of Maryland State Bar Association, Maryland Association for Justice, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted13 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved1,820 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 15 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.78 over 1,820 reviews → Bayesian 4.78 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle47 of 73 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-05) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle4 of 73 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 29 → 69th pct of 26-firm cohort (median 19) 2/3 · 676 referring domains, 62th pct 1/2 · 473 organic keywords / 2,799 visits·mo, 90th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle15 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
5/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Maryland x Personal Injury (27 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
29· 69th percentile
676 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 4.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
2 / 2
blog · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Passmobile
Performance 99
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-14

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Portner & Shure, P.A. lists 13 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 1,820 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 15 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 15 locations · main office: Columbia

Columbia7226 Lee Deforest Dr Ste 101, Columbia, MD 21046, USA
Glen Burnie7310 Ritchie Hwy Ste 409, Glen Burnie, MD 21061, USA
Fairfax4157 Chain Bridge Rd, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
Silver Spring8455 Colesville Rd Ste 720, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
Hagerstown201 Prospect Ave #106, Hagerstown, MD 21742, USA
Annapolis1910 Towne Centre Blvd #250, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA
Bel Air3 Vale Rd Ste 100, Bel Air, MD 21014, USA
Pasadena8131 Ritchie Hwy Ste i room a, Pasadena, MD 21122, USA
WashingtonSouth Building, 601 Pennsylvania Ave NW #900, Washington, DC 20004, USA
Alexandria211 N Union St Suite 100, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA
Richmond9100 Arboretum Pkwy Suite 340, Richmond, VA 23236, USA
Salisbury100 E Main St Ste 503, Salisbury, MD 21801, USA
Baltimore400 E Pratt St #800, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA
Baltimore100 International Drive F23, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA
Frederick5216 Chairmans Ct #106, Frederick, MD 21703, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Portner & Shure charge?
Portner & Shure publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Portner & Shure offer a free consultation?
Yes. Portner & Shure publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Portner & Shure have offices?
Portner & Shure publishes 15 offices, among them Columbia, Glen Burnie, Fairfax and Silver Spring. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Portner & Shure?
Portner & Shure names 39 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Maryland does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Portner & Shure publishes verified?
No. Portner & Shure publishes 13 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Portner & Shure?
Portner & Shure scores 67 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.