- Home
- Los Angeles, CA
- Personal Injury
- Providence Trial Lawyers
Providence Trial Lawyers
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
Contingency
Free consultations, no fee unless we win.
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
6Practice areas
About Providence Trial Lawyers
Providence Trial Lawyers is a personal injury firm with a single office in Los Angeles.
The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free; its intake line is open around the clock. It publishes material in English and Spanish.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 3 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
5 average over 182 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
Free consultations, no fee unless we win.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
19 years average at the bar
Mean 19.0 years since admission across 3 of 3 named attorneys (longest 32, shortest 11) · NYS Attorney Registration database
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
57out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 20268 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (60% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available · D2 Search authority: +5 available
G1 Licensure3 of 3 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 3 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 3 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint182 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2025-05-29, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing15/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 19.0 years since admission across 3 of 3 named attorneys (longest 32, shortest 11) · NYS Attorney Registration database9 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry3 of 3 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio6 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved182 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 182 reviews → Bayesian 4.94 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-24) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 9.0 → 43th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 1/3 · 1,445 referring domains, 78th pct 2/2 · 1 organic keywords / 2 visits·mo, 14th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness9/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “Free consultations, no fee unless we win.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
9· 42th percentile
1,445 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 19.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · attorney bios · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 94
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12Practice areas 6 areas · primary focus highlighted
Attorneys 3 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register
EL
Edward Y. LeeFounder/Trial Attorney
AL
Angela S. LeeTrial Attorney
MH
Matthew HillixAdmitted in CA
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 182 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Los Angeles
Los Angeles777 S Figueroa St #3050, Los Angeles, CA 90017, USA