LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBaltimore, MD● Accepting new clients
★★★★★4.9 · 538 Google reviews3 offices8 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
Hospital& home visits
2Practice areas
About Rice Law
Rice Law is a personal injury firm with offices in Timonium, Baltimore and Wheaton.
The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free; its intake line is open around the clock; it will visit clients in hospital or at home.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2614 published discipline decisions of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, 1976 to 2026. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
538 client reviews
Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.88 average over 538 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
10 results published
Across 9 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
60out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Maryland does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (70% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D3 Local presence: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MDMaryland does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2614 published discipline decisions of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, 1976 to 2026. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MD3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Maryland publishes no business register we can query. SDAT's entity search is a form rather than a dataset, its bulk data is sold rather than published, and the state's open data portal carries a count of businesses instead of the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 8 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint538 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2008-06-28, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMaryland publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted10 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted9 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present, as the advertising rules require4 / 4
CClient Experience
15/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved538 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.88 over 538 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle7 of 14 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-18) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle3 of 14 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them1 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
12/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · no bar numbers on bios · fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content4.5 / 7
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Rice Law lists 10 case results on its own website, across 9 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 8 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Eric S. Lickstein
George Psoras Jr.
Austin E. Cohen
Jenna Linn-Rice
Nicholas Vogt
Gregory J. Psoras
Randolph Rice
John Hammann
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 538 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Timonium
Timonium1954 Greenspring Dr #555, Timonium, MD 21093, USA
Baltimore6914 Holabird Ave Ste A, Baltimore, MD 21222, USA
Wheaton2730 University Blvd W Ste 604A, Wheaton, MD 20902, USA