1. Home
  2. San Antonio, TX
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers

Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Antonio, TX● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 552 Google reviews4 offices5 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
6Practice areas

About Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers

Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers works from four offices across Texas and names six attorneys.

552 reviews at 5.0 across four listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

552 client reviews

Counted across 4 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

5 average over 552 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

53out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
12 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (61% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity on the Texas list of active franchise taxpayers. Texas does not require a sole proprietorship or a general partnership to pay franchise tax, and an exempt entity is left off as well, so this is a check this source cannot complete rather than evidence against the firm. The state's own SOSDirect service can settle it for a fee
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 5 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint552 public client reviews across 4 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2024-04-05, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of State Bar of Texas · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
20/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved552 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 552 reviews → Bayesian 4.97 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle17 of 17 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-21) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 17 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 19 → 56th pct of 63-firm cohort (median 17.5) 2/3 · 1,102 referring domains, 65th pct 1/2 · 207 organic keywords / 1,310 visits·mo, 70th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle4 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Antonio Personal Injury (64 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
19· 56th percentile
1,102 ref. domains · cohort median 17.5 · Ahrefs rank 9.0M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 85
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-29

Attorneys 2 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Texas attorney register · 3 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

AT
Arthur S. Ried TexasTrial Attorney
JT
Juan R. Pecina TexasTrial Attorney

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 552 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 4 locations · main office: San Antonio

San Antonio6502 Bandera Rd Ste 104, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA
Harlingen222 E Van Buren Ave #700, Harlingen, TX 78550, USA
Brownsville4002 Paredes Line Rd Ste. 28, Brownsville, TX 78526, USA
San Antonio7800 I-10 Ste 110, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers charge?
Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers offer a free consultation?
Yes. Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers have offices?
Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers publishes four offices, among them San Antonio, Harlingen and Brownsville. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers?
Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers names six attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers?
Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers scores 51 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.