ListedPersonal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★4.9 · 580 Google reviews1 office0 attorneysEnglish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Rights Protection Law Group
The Rights Protection Law Group describes itself as a consumer protection firm based in Boston and serving seven states, and it publishes an injury practice page alongside that work. It is on State Street, in the financial district.
580 reviews at 4.9. It states no fee model in terms we could record, names no attorney on the pages we could reach, and its site is among the slowest here on Core Web Vitals.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
580 client reviews
Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.9 average over 580 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
36out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 100 points this firm's state lets anyone measure. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (50% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: not yet measured (9 pts) · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint580 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2011-10-15, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityPendingNo attorney is named on the site we could read0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved580 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 580 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-03) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
Based on 580 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm