LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPortland, OR● Accepting new clients
★★★★★4.7 · 83 Google reviews1 office2 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyWe represent accident victims on a contingency fee basis without requiring any upfront, out-of-pocket attorney fees or costs.
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Rizk Law
Rizk Law works from Southwest Iowa Street in Portland and names Richard Rizk and one associate. It says it represents accident victims on a contingency fee without up-front cost, and publishes every trust page pillar D looks for.
83 reviews at 4.7.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 457 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Oregon on the conduct of Oregon State Bar members, 1951 to 2017. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
Fee terms published
We represent accident victims on a contingency fee basis without requiring any upfront, out-of-pocket attorney fees or costs.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
38out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Oregon does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (42% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by OROregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 457 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Oregon on the conduct of Oregon State Bar members, 1951 to 2017. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeRIZK LAW, P.C. is registered with the Oregon Secretary of State, under number 8602294, since 2002-06-07, and 1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 2 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint83 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2001-04-17, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceOregon publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved83 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.7 over 83 reviews → Bayesian 4.77 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle3 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-04-08) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
9/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · We represent accident victims on a contingency fee basis without requiring any upfront, out-of-pocket attorney fees or costs. · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 2 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Alex Pletch
Richard Rizk
Client reviews
4.7
★★★★★
Based on 83 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm