RMD Law
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 67Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
Contingency
Most personal injury law firms work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don’t pay unless your case is successful.
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
6Practice areas
About RMD Law
RMD Law works from seven offices across California, among them Irvine, Los Angeles and Long Beach, and names eight attorneys.
509 reviews at 4.99 across seven listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes twelve case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 67 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
No public discipline
No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 6 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
509 client reviews
Counted across 7 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.99 average over 509 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
Most personal injury law firms work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don’t pay unless your case is successful.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
12 results published
Across 5 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
67out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar D (10/25).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 202611 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (70% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +4.5 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +3.5 available
G1 Licensure6 of 8 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 2 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 6 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA7 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 7 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint509 public client reviews across 7 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2008-10-15, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing12/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 10.0 years since admission across 6 of 7 named attorneys (longest 18, shortest 3) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry6 of 7 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio4.5 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes10/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted12 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted5 case types named; 2 court or county references5 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved509 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 7 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.99 over 509 reviews → Bayesian 4.96 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle20 of 35 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-03) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 35 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 29 → 74th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 1,651 referring domains, 86th pct 2/2 · 225 organic keywords / 4,252 visits·mo, 82th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle7 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness9/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “Most personal injury law firms work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don’t pay unless your case is successful.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
29· 72th percentile
1,651 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 4.4M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · privacy policy · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 66
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 6 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
RMD Law lists 12 case results on its own website, across 5 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathpedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 6 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
AM
Aria MiranAdmitted in NY
JR
John RajaeeAdmitted in NY
ND
Nicole DolleAdmitted in NY
RD
Ryan DrakulichAdmitted in NY
YQ
Yen QuachAdmitted in NY
SP
Shabnam PourghorbanAdmitted in NY
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 509 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 7 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 7 locations · main office: Irvine
Irvine17885 Von Karman Ave Ste 250, Irvine, CA 92614, USA
Los Angeles145 S Fairfax Ave #200, Los Angeles, CA 90036, USA
Long Beach111 W Ocean Blvd Unit 400, Long Beach, CA 90802, USA
San Diego402 W Broadway Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92101, USA
San Bernardino473 E Carnegie Dr #200, San Bernardino, CA 92408, USA
San Francisco505 Montgomery St Ste 1100, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA
Sacramento500 Capitol Mall #2350, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does RMD Law charge?
RMD Law publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does RMD Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. RMD Law publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does RMD Law have offices?
RMD Law publishes seven offices, among them Irvine, Los Angeles, Long Beach and San Diego. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at RMD Law?
RMD Law names eight attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results RMD Law publishes verified?
No. RMD Law publishes twelve case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about RMD Law?
RMD Law scores 69 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.