1. Home
  2. Chicago, IL
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Romanucci & Blandin

Romanucci & Blandin

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryChicago, IL● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.7 · 190 Google reviews1 office55 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
7Practice areas

About Romanucci & Blandin

Romanucci & Blandin works from North Clark Street and names 61 attorneys.

190 reviews at 4.7. Contingency fees, a free consultation and pages in Spanish, published.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

4.7 average over 190 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

48out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Illinois does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
17 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (45% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by ILIllinois does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by ILIllinois does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by IL1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Illinois publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 43 named attorneys published, and 15 more people in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint190 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2003-06-03, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceIllinois publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceIllinois publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved190 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.7 over 190 reviews → Bayesian 4.74 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-10) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
11/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 49 → 93th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 18) 3/3 · 2,286 referring domains, 93th pct 2/2 · 1,471 organic keywords / 17,107 visits·mo, 96th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
4/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Chicago Personal Injury (110 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
49· 93th percentile
2,286 ref. domains · cohort median 18 · Ahrefs rank 0.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · blog · disclaimer · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 74
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26

Attorneys 26 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Illinois attorney register · 14 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys · 15 people are named in a role that is not a lawyer’s

PF
Proven Police Excessive ForceAttorney
SC
Skilled Police ChaseInjury Attorney
CM
Compassionate Cancer MisdiagnosisAttorney
EP
Experienced PharmaceuticalMalpractice Attorney
AR
Antonio M. RomanucciFounding Partner
GD
Gina Arquilla DeBoniManaging & Senior Partner
MH
Michael E. HoldenSenior Partner
FS
Frank A. SommarioSenior Partner
DA
Daisy AyllónPartner
MC
Michael D. CerasaPartner
JG
John R. GoreyPartner
JK
Joseph E. KolarPartner
PM
Paul M. McMahonPartner
SR
Sarah M. RaischPartner
DT
Debra L. ThomasManaging Attorney
BB
Benjamin A. BerkmanSenior Attorney
MD
Michelle R. DiSilvestroSenior Attorney
SH
Sam A. HartonSenior Attorney
PH
Patrick A. HuberSenior Attorney
JL
Joshua M. LevinSenior Attorney
SW
Stephen H. WeilSenior Attorney
MW
Maura D. WhiteSenior Attorney
CT
Colton M. Johnson TaylorAttorney
IM
Isabella A. MazzantiAttorney
SB
Stephan D. BlandinOf Counsel
RP
Richard F. PellegrinoOf Counsel

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s

The firm names these people among its team and prints the role below beside the names. They are not counted as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.7
★★★★★
Based on 190 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Chicago

Chicago321 N Clark St #900, Chicago, IL 60654, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Romanucci & Blandin charge?
Romanucci & Blandin publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Romanucci & Blandin offer a free consultation?
Yes. Romanucci & Blandin publishes a free initial consultation. It publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Romanucci & Blandin have offices?
Romanucci & Blandin publishes one office, in Chicago. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Romanucci & Blandin?
Romanucci & Blandin names 61 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Illinois does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Romanucci & Blandin?
Romanucci & Blandin scores 46 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.