- Home
- Portland, OR
- Personal Injury
- Rosenbaum Law Group, PC
Rosenbaum Law Group, PC
ListedPersonal InjuryPortland, OR● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Rosenbaum Law Group
Rosenbaum Law Group works from Northeast Broadway and opens its site with an explanation of when somebody has an injury case at all, which is a more useful first page than most.
A free consultation, published. Its site is one of two in this market that passes Core Web Vitals outright, at 99 on PageSpeed. It states no fee model in terms we could record and names no attorney on the pages we could reach.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
31out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 100 points this firm's state lets anyone measure. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (42% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: not yet measured (9 pts) · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by OROregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by OROregon does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeROSENBAUM LAW GROUP, P.C. is registered with the Oregon Secretary of State, under number 120018791, since 2016-03-22, and 1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint67 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2016-03-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityPendingNo attorney is named on the site we could read0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved67 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 67 reviews → Bayesian 4.85 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-01) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · no privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content3.5 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 10 → 32th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 24) 1/3 · 457 referring domains, 21th pct 0/2 · 115 organic keywords / 438 visits·mo, 55th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness1/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Portland x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
10· 32th percentile
457 ref. domains · cohort median 24 · Ahrefs rank 17.0M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
2 / 2
disclaimer · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Passmobile
Performance 99
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 67 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Portland
Portland1826 NE Broadway, Portland, OR 97232, USA