- Home
- New York, NY
- Personal Injury
- Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers
Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 71Personal InjuryNew York, NY● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
9Practice areas
About Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers
Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers is a New York City personal injury firm with offices in Manhattan, Brooklyn and the Bronx.
The firm states that consultations are free and that it works on a contingency fee basis, with no attorney's fees owed unless and until it recovers compensation. It publishes a 24-hour intake line and service in English and Spanish.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 71 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
No public discipline
None of the 9 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
4.81 average over 262 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
50 results published
Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
71out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 88 of the 88 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 12 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar E (7/15).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 28, 20267 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (75% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +5 available · A5 Accountability: +3 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +3 available
G1 Licensure9 of 11 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status. 2 could not be told apart from namesakes in the register and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNone of the 9 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity found in the active corporations register. New York does not require a general partnership to file with the Department of State, so this is not evidence against the firm, only a check we could not complete from this source
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 11 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint262 public client reviews and 20 years since its web address was registered in 2006
AProfessional Standing12/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 8.4 years since admission across 9 of 11 named attorneys (longest 30, shortest 0) · NYS Attorney Registration database5 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry9 of 11 named attorneys matched to the New York register; bar numbers published on the bios7.5 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes13/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted50 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved262 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.81 over 262 reviews → Bayesian 4.81 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle9 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-22) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority13/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 49 → 92th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 27.5) 3/3 · 1,162 referring domains, 81th pct 2/2 · 1,387 organic keywords / 8,551 visits·mo, 88th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · cited in AI answers: 346 citations / 128 pages 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media leave the scale (3 pts)2 / 2
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: New York × Personal Injury (81 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
49· 91th percentile
1,162 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 0.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16AI-search citations
346· 128 pages
ChatGPT 20 · Perplexity 28 · Gemini 12 · AI Overviews 14 · Copilot 21
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
5 / 5
blog · fee statement · attorney bios · privacy policy · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 90
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-10Practice areas 9 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers lists 50 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticeworkplacepedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 9 attorneys · every licence checked against the New York attorney register · 2 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
AM
Andrew G. MeierAdmitted in NY
EK
Edwin KimAdmitted in NY
NM
Nikki M. MuccioAdmitted in NY
EM
Erica M. MartiniAdmitted in NY
GT
Gianni A. TribuzioAdmitted in NY
SH
Sara HosseiniAdmitted in NY
CR
Craig D. RosenbaumAdmitted in NY
JN
Jordan J. NazarzadehAdmitted in NY
MH
Meran HamidAdmitted in NY
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.8
★★★★★
Based on 262 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Manhattan
Manhattan100 Wall St 15th Floor, New York, NY 10005, USA
Brooklyn32 Court St #704, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
Bronx1578 Williamsbridge Rd Ste 3b, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers charge?
Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers offer a free consultation?
Yes. Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers have offices?
Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers publishes three offices, in Manhattan, Brooklyn and Bronx. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers?
Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers names eleven attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. 9 of 11 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status. 2 could not be told apart from namesakes in the register and are counted neither way.
Are the case results Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers publishes verified?
No. Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers publishes 50 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers?
Rosenbaum Meier Personal Injury Lawyers scores 69 and sits at Verified. Passed: licensure, discipline, website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.