1. Home
  2. Portland, OR
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Ross Law PDX

Ross Law PDX

ListedPersonal InjuryPortland, OR● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 61 Google reviews1 office0 attorneysEnglish
Not statedFee model
PaidInitial consultation
1Practice areas

About Ross Law PDX

Ross Law works from Southwest Pine Street in Portland, and what it publishes about its practice is unlike anything else in this ranking: crime survivors, systemic failures and patient safety rather than car accidents.

61 reviews at 4.9. It states no fee model and no free consultation in terms we could record, publishes only attorney bios of the trust pages pillar D looks for, and names no attorney on the pages we could reach.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

24out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 100 points this firm's state lets anyone measure. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Listed

1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (40% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: not yet measured (9 pts) · D1 Website trust & experience: +7 available
G1 LicensureNot published by OROregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by OROregon does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by OR1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. We read the Active Businesses register (data.oregon.gov tckn-sxa6), published as open data by the Oregon Secretary of State and could not identify this firm in it: 3 entity name(s) contain the firm's name and none of them agrees on both the name and the city. A miss there is not evidence that the firm is unregistered, so this gate is unresolved rather than failed.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint61 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2013-01-17, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityPendingNo attorney is named on the site we could read0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience
15/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved61 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 61 reviews → Bayesian 4.85 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle2 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-01-15) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
4/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pending · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · no fresh content0 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 8 → 24th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 24) 1/3 · 527 referring domains, 26th pct 1/2 · 27 organic keywords / 143 visits·mo, 18th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness
0/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedfee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published0 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Portland x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
8· 24th percentile
527 ref. domains · cohort median 24 · Ahrefs rank 20.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
1 / 1
attorney bios
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Not measuredmobile
PageSpeed Insights measurement pending
Pending

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

Personal Injury

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 61 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Portland

Portland50 SW Pine St 4th Floor, Suite 402, Portland, OR 97204, USA