- Home
- Phoenix, AZ
- Personal Injury
- Rowley Chapman & Barney, Ltd.
Rowley Chapman & Barney, Ltd.
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhoenix, AZ● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
2Practice areas
About Rowley Chapman & Barney, Ltd.
Rowley Chapman & Barney works from East Main Street in Mesa and names four attorneys. 30 years by its domain registration, the longest history of any firm listed in Phoenix.
110 reviews at 4.8. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
4.8 average over 110 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
38out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Arizona does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 202627 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (34% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by AZArizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by AZArizona does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by AZ1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Arizona publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 4 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint110 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 1996-03-28, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience13/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved110 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.8 over 110 reviews → Bayesian 4.81 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2025-06-05) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review1 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 10 → 39th pct of 100-firm cohort (median 16) 1/3 · 1,150 referring domains, 64th pct 1/2 · 50 organic keywords / 286 visits·mo, 52th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Phoenix Personal Injury (101 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
10· 39th percentile
1,150 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 18.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 58
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 2 areas · primary focus highlighted
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 4 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.8
★★★★★
Based on 110 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Mesa
Mesa63 E Main St Ste 501, Mesa, AZ 85201, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Rowley Chapman & Barney charge?
Rowley Chapman & Barney publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Rowley Chapman & Barney offer a free consultation?
Yes. Rowley Chapman & Barney publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Rowley Chapman & Barney have offices?
Rowley Chapman & Barney publishes one office, in Mesa. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Rowley Chapman & Barney?
Rowley Chapman & Barney names four attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Arizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Rowley Chapman & Barney?
Rowley Chapman & Barney scores 36 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.