1. Home
  2. Philadelphia, PA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C.

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C.

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhiladelphia, PA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.7 · 287 Google reviews1 office59 attorneysEnglish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
6Practice areas

About Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky works from Market Street One Liberty Place and names 59 attorneys.

287 reviews at 4.7. A free consultation, published. It publishes 35 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on the discipline of members of the Pennsylvania bar, prosecuted by its Disciplinary Board, 1976 to 2019. 5 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

4.7 average over 287 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

35 results published

Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

60out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Pennsylvania does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar E (1/15).

LFL Verified 2026
5 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (76% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by PAPennsylvania does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on the discipline of members of the Pennsylvania bar, prosecuted by its Disciplinary Board, 1976 to 2019. 5 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by PA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Pennsylvania publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 59 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint287 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 1998-11-23, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourcePennsylvania publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourcePennsylvania publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice, American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, American Bar Association and 3 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted35 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved287 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.7 over 287 reviews → Bayesian 4.73 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-25) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
11/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 41 → 88th pct of 73-firm cohort (median 19) 3/3 · 2,175 referring domains, 97th pct 2/2 · 676 organic keywords / 5,923 visits·mo, 92th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
1/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Philadelphia Personal Injury (74 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
41· 88th percentile
2,175 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 1.5M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
4 / 4
blog · disclaimer · privacy policy · attorney bios
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 54
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. lists 35 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplaceproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 54 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Pennsylvania attorney register · 5 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

MG
Mary T. GidaroPartner
SP
Simon B. ParisPartner
MC
Mariano CepedaAssociate
EC
Emily Grubb CoffingAssociate
SH
Samuel A. HaazAssociate
TS
Tracy D. SchwartzAssociate
JW
Jason WhalleyAssociate
KM
Keith P. MeccaOf Counsel
LA
Lydia AbdoAssociate
RC
Ryan M. CohenPartner
JS
Jonathan SilvaAssociate
JB
Joseph BatastiniAssociate
BC
Brooke CarickhoffAssociate
LW
Lily WinterAssociate
OS
Olivia SzumskiAssociate
RB
Robert N. BrakerPartner
AA
Ara R. AvrigianPartner
MB
Michael A. BudnerPartner
BE
Benjamin J. EichelPartner
SF
Scott A. FellmethPartner
DG
Denise H. GeorgesPartner
KH
K. Andrew HeinoldPartner
PH
Patrick HowardPartner
JS
John E. SindoniPartner
JS
Joshua D. SnyderPartner
JV
J. Peter VeloskiPartner
AA
Anwar Abdur-RahmanAssociate
MD
Max DehonAssociate
VD
Veronica M. DiBelloAssociate
MK
Morgan A. KendallAssociate
JL
John L. LangAssociate
DJ
David C. Magagna Jr.Associate
MM
Michael ManaraAssociate
JP
Javier PugaAssociate
RM
Rayna McCarthyAssociate
JG
Jeffrey P. GoodmanPartner
MZ
Michael J. ZettlemoyerPartner
AB
Alan J. BorowskyPartner
RM
Robert J. MongeluzziFounder
LB
Larry BendeskyManaging Shareholder
LC
Lawrence R. CohanPartner
SD
Samuel B. DordickPartner
MP
Michael PileggiAssociate
AR
Alison J. RussellAssociate
JC
Joshua C. CohanPartner
DK
David L. KwassPartner
JW
Jason S. WeissPartner
SW
Steven G. WigrizerPartner
RZ
Robert W. ZimmermanPartner
AD
Andrew R. DuffyPartner
AC
Aidan CarickhoffPartner
JG
Jake P. GlancyAssociate
AP
Adam J. PantanoPartner
JH
Jordan HowellPartner

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.7
★★★★★
Based on 287 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Philadelphia

Philadelphia1650 Market Street One Liberty Place, 52nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky charge?
Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky offer a free consultation?
Yes. Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky have offices?
Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky publishes one office, in Philadelphia. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky?
Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky names 59 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Pennsylvania does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky publishes verified?
No. Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky publishes 35 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky?
Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky scores 59 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.