- Home
- San Diego, CA
- Personal Injury
- San Diego
San Diego
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
5Practice areas
About San Diego
San Diego works from Camino Del Rio North and names three attorneys.
142 reviews at 4.9. A free consultation and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 1 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
4.9 average over 142 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
60out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 72 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar B in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 2026Certified needs more measured
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (69% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: not yet measured (6 pts) · B2 Specificity: not yet measured (5 pts) · B3 Results disclosure: not yet measured (4 pts)
G1 Licensure1 of 3 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 2 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 1 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 2 named attorneys published, and 1 more person in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint142 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2004-10-04, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing13/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 11.0 years since admission across 1 of 2 named attorneys (longest 11, shortest 11) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry1 of 2 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedPendingthe results page served 4633 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 6
B2 SpecificityPendingthe results page served 4633 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 5
B3 Results disclosurePendingthe results page served 4633 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 4
CClient Experience16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved142 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 142 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle2 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-04-10) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority12/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 29 → 74th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 986 referring domains, 48th pct 1/2 · 288 organic keywords / 1,163 visits·mo, 76th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness2/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
29· 72th percentile
986 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 4.5M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
5 / 5
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy · disclaimer · fee statement
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Passmobile
Performance 96
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 5 areas · primary focus highlighted
Attorneys 2 attorneys · 1 of 2 licences checked against the California attorney register · 1 person is named in a role that is not a lawyer’s
KM
Karla MoraAdmitted in NY
MB
Member Edward "Skip" BabbittOf Counsel
Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s
The firm names this person among its team and prints the role below beside the name. They are not counted as attorneys.
- Ingrid Kleinert Paralegal
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 142 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Law Offices of Mark C. Blane, APC
Law Offices of Mark C. Blane, APC3111 Camino Del Rio N #400, San Diego, CA 92108, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does San Diego charge?
San Diego publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does San Diego offer a free consultation?
Yes. San Diego publishes a free initial consultation. It publishes material in Spanish.
Where does San Diego have offices?
San Diego publishes one office, in San Diego. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at San Diego?
San Diego names three attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about San Diego?
San Diego scores 61 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.