1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. SFA LAW

SFA LAW

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 543 Google reviews2 offices12 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyNO WIN, NO FEE At SFA LAW, we believe in justice without the financial risk.
FreeInitial consultation
6Practice areas

About SFA LAW

SFA LAW is a personal injury firm with offices in Los Angeles and Glendale.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 10 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

543 client reviews

Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.9 average over 543 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Fee terms published

NO WIN, NO FEE At SFA LAW, we believe in justice without the financial risk.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

48out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
17 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (55% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: +6 available · D2 Search authority: +6 available · A2 Experience: +5 available
G1 Licensure10 of 12 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 2 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 10 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 12 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint543 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2010-06-14, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
12/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 9.8 years since admission across 10 of 12 named attorneys (longest 34, shortest 1) · NYS Attorney Registration database5 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry10 of 12 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio4.5 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved543 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 543 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle10 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-29) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 10.0 → 45th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 1/3 · 883 referring domains, 11th pct 0/2 · 14 organic keywords / 52 visits·mo, 40th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
5/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “NO WIN, NO FEE At SFA LAW, we believe in justice without the financial risk.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
10· 44th percentile
883 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 17.5M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 43
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Attorneys 10 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 2 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

GT
George TerterianAttorney
LD
Levon DevoianAdmitted in CA
MM
Marissa MinnickAdmitted in CA
AY
Armineh YousefianAttorney
TA
Tatevik AghamalyanAttorney
SM
Shahane A. MartirosyanPartner
SA
Stephan AirapetianPartner
JA
Johnny AbdalnourAdmitted in CA
AD
Arthur DermendjianManaging Attorney
AE
Asa EatonAssociate Attorney

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 543 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Los Angeles

Los Angeles633 W 5th St suite 2838 28th floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071, USA
Glendale100 W Broadway #1200, Glendale, CA 91210, USA