1. Home
  2. San Diego, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Silva Injury Law, Inc.

Silva Injury Law, Inc.

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 610 Google reviews5 offices36 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas

About Silva Injury Law, Inc.

Silva Injury Law works from five offices across California, among them Turlock, Merced and San Diego, and names 37 attorneys.

610 reviews at 5.0 across five listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes 53 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 9 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

610 client reviews

Counted across 5 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

5 average over 610 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

53 results published

Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

61out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (6/25).

LFL Verified 2026
4 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (68% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +8 available · A2 Experience: +5 available · D2 Search authority: +4 available
G1 Licensure9 of 37 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 28 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 9 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA5 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 37 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint610 public client reviews across 5 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2017-04-25, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
6/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 8.3 years since admission across 10 of 36 named attorneys (longest 19, shortest 1) · NYS Attorney Registration database5 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry10 of 36 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio1 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
13/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted53 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
20/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved610 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 610 reviews → Bayesian 4.98 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle23 of 25 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-19) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 25 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 31 → 79th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 1,297 referring domains, 72th pct 1/2 · 8 organic keywords / 320 visits·mo, 38th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle5 operational Google Business Profile listings · 3 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.3 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
31· 77th percentile
1,297 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 3.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · disclaimer · privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 27
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Silva Injury Law, Inc. lists 53 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathworkplacepedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 10 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 26 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

MK
Matt KrachtAdmitted in NY
LY
Lina YooAdmitted in NY
AB
Alec BarcelosAdmitted in NY
TC
Tanner CombsAdmitted in NY
CJ
Cassidy JensenAdmitted in NY
MS
Michael Joe SilvaAdmitted in NY
NA
Nathalia AguirreAdmitted in NY
LM
Lindy MunozAdmitted in NY
SB
Sarah BoydAdmitted in NY
SS
Sonia SalinasAdmitted in NY

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 610 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 5 locations · main office: Turlock

Turlock2857 Geer Rd # B, Turlock, CA 95382, USA
Merced1170 W Olive Ave G7, Merced, CA 95348, USA
San Diego4241 Jutland Dr Ste 309, San Diego, CA 92117, USA
San Francisco505 Montgomery St #1059, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA
Monterey215 W Franklin St #212, Monterey, CA 93940, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Silva Injury Law charge?
Silva Injury Law publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Silva Injury Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. Silva Injury Law publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Silva Injury Law have offices?
Silva Injury Law publishes five offices, in Turlock, Merced, San Diego, San Francisco and Monterey. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Silva Injury Law?
Silva Injury Law names 37 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Silva Injury Law publishes verified?
No. Silva Injury Law publishes 53 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Silva Injury Law?
Silva Injury Law scores 68 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.