1. Home
  2. Houston, TX
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Sneed

Sneed

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryHouston, TX● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 523 Google reviews2 offices1 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyThis is why our firm handles claims on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing until we win!
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
4Practice areas

About Sneed

Sneed works from Robinhood Street in Houston, with a second office in San Antonio, and names a single attorney.

523 reviews at 4.92 across two listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

523 client reviews

Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.92 average over 523 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Fee terms published

This is why our firm handles claims on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing until we win!

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

46out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
19 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (47% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity on the Texas list of active franchise taxpayers. Texas does not require a sole proprietorship or a general partnership to pay franchise tax, and an exempt entity is left off as well, so this is a check this source cannot complete rather than evidence against the firm. The state's own SOSDirect service can settle it for a fee
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published.
G6 Footprint523 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2018-05-14, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved523 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.92 over 523 reviews → Bayesian 4.90 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-06) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm0 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 23 → 55th pct of 74-firm cohort (median 19) 2/3 · 931 referring domains, 41th pct 1/2 · 352 organic keywords / 1,328 visits·mo, 69th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
8/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “This is why our firm handles claims on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing until we win!” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Houston Personal Injury (100 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
23· 41th percentile
931 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 7.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
1 / 1
attorney bios
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 58
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-25

Practice areas 4 areas · primary focus highlighted

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 523 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Houston

Houston2525 Robinhood St #1100, Houston, TX 77005, USA
San Antonio8940 Fourwinds Dr, San Antonio, TX 78239, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Sneed charge?
Sneed publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Sneed offer a free consultation?
Yes. Sneed publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Sneed have offices?
Sneed publishes two offices, in Houston and San Antonio. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Sneed?
Sneed names one attorney on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Sneed?
Sneed scores 46 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.