LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★4.9 · 521 Google reviews3 offices3 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Spada Law Group
Spada Law Group works from Everett Avenue in Chelsea, with offices in Lawrence and Newburyport, and names three attorneys. It publishes in Spanish, and it is one of the few firms here with a fee statement rather than only a promise.
521 reviews at 4.9. Chelsea is its own city rather than a Boston neighbourhood, and its postal area sits inside this market's boundary.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
521 client reviews
Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.9 average over 521 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
48out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 63 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillars A and B in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (72% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · B1 Results published: not yet measured (6 pts) · B2 Specificity: not yet measured (5 pts)
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 3 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint521 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2016-07-28, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedPendingthe results page served 4773 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 6
B2 SpecificityPendingthe results page served 4773 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 5
B3 Results disclosurePendingthe results page served 4773 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved521 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 521 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-30) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
9/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content3 / 7
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
Attorneys 1 attorney · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Massachusetts attorney register · 2 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
SK
Sean P. KellySenior Trial Attorney
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Stephen Zolotas
Arinda Brooks
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 521 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Chelsea
Chelsea111 Everett Ave #1f, Chelsea, MA 02150, USA
Springfield1350 Main St #318, Springfield, MA 01103, USA
Newburyport150 Merrimac St Unit E, Newburyport, MA 01950, USA
