- Home
- New York, NY
- Criminal Defense
- Spahija Law
Spahija Law
ListedCriminal DefenseNew York, NY● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
1Practice areas
About Spahija Law
Spahija Law works from Prince Street in Brooklyn, with a second office in Staten Island, and names no attorney on the pages we could reach.
62 reviews at 5.0 across two listings. A free consultation and a 24 hour line, published. It publishes four case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
53out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
12 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (71% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +6 available
G1 LicensureNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on its public pages, so there is no roster whose licensure can be checked. The register is open and free to search; the names are what is missing.
G2 DisciplineNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on its public pages, so there is no roster whose disciplinary history can be checked. The register is open and free to search; the names are what is missing.
G3 Entity & officeLAW OFFICE OF AMEL SPAHIJA PLLC is an active domestic professional service limited liability company registered since 2024-10-24, with 2 Google-verified locations
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint62 public client reviews and 2 years since the entity was formed in 2024
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is no admission year to establish for anybody. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes11/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted4 results published on the firm's own site, counted from result headings3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted2 case types named; 4 court or county references4 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved62 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 62 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-15) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-01DR 1.4 → 23th pct of 84-firm cohort (median 7) 1/3 · 898 referring domains, 26th pct 1/2 · 1 organic keywords / 1 visits·mo, 10th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 6 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.6 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-01JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness4/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: New York Criminal Defense (85 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
1.4· 23th percentile
898 ref. domains · cohort median 7 · Ahrefs rank 53.4M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-01Trust pages
3 / 3
blog · privacy policy · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 86
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-01Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Spahija Law lists 4 case results on its own website, across 2 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
assaultweapons
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 62 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: Brooklyn
Brooklyn147 Prince St Suite 238, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
Staten Island900 South Ave #37, Staten Island, NY 10314, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Spahija Law charge?
Spahija Law publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Spahija Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. Spahija Law publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Spahija Law have offices?
Spahija Law publishes two offices, in Brooklyn and Staten Island. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Spahija Law?
Spahija Law names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
Are the case results Spahija Law publishes verified?
No. Spahija Law publishes four case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Spahija Law?
Spahija Law scores 52 and sits at Listed. Passed: entity registration and footprint. Did not pass: website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.