1. Home
  2. San Antonio, TX
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Strauch Law Firm

Strauch Law Firm

ListedPersonal InjurySan Antonio, TX● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 70 Google reviews1 office0 attorneysEnglish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
2Practice areas

About Strauch Law Firm

Strauch Law Firm works from East Park Avenue and names no attorney on the pages we could reach.

70 reviews at 4.9. A free consultation, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

42out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Listed

1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar E (1/15).

23 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (61% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +8 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity on the Texas list of active franchise taxpayers. Texas does not require a sole proprietorship or a general partnership to pay franchise tax, and an exempt entity is left off as well, so this is a check this source cannot complete rather than evidence against the firm. The state's own SOSDirect service can settle it for a fee
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint70 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2003-06-11, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of State Bar of Texas · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
5/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted1 result published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts1 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted2 case types named; 1 court or county reference4 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
15/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved70 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 70 reviews → Bayesian 4.86 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle2 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-05-26) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
4/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 0.4 → 4th pct of 63-firm cohort (median 17.5) 0/3 · 774 referring domains, 14th pct 0/2 · 1 organic keywords / 2 visits·mo, 6th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)0 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 5 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.5 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
1/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Antonio Personal Injury (64 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
0.4· 4th percentile
774 ref. domains · cohort median 17.5 · Ahrefs rank 72.5M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
4 / 4
disclaimer · privacy policy · fee statement · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 69
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-29

Practice areas 2 areas · primary focus highlighted

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Strauch Law Firm lists 1 case result on its own website, across 2 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionwrongful death
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 70 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: San Antonio

San Antonio225 E Park Ave, San Antonio, TX 78212, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Strauch Law Firm charge?
Strauch Law Firm publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Strauch Law Firm offer a free consultation?
Yes. Strauch Law Firm publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Strauch Law Firm have offices?
Strauch Law Firm publishes one office, in San Antonio. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Strauch Law Firm?
Strauch Law Firm names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Strauch Law Firm?
Strauch Law Firm scores 41 and sits at Listed. Passed: footprint. Did not pass: entity registration and website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.