- Home
- New York, NY
- Personal Injury
- Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo, P.C.
Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo, P.C.
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryNew York, NY● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
8Practice areas
About Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo
Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo works from four offices across New York and New Jersey, and names 34 attorneys.
88 reviews at 4.7 across three listings. Contingency fees and a free consultation, published.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
None of the 33 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
23 years average at the bar
Mean 23.0 years since admission across 33 of 34 named attorneys (longest 52, shortest 0) · NYS Attorney Registration database
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
55out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: A; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 202610 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (61% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available · E4 Availability: +5 available
G1 Licensure33 of 34 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status. 1 could not be told apart from namesakes in the register and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNone of the 33 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity found in the active corporations register. New York does not require a general partnership to file with the Department of State, so this is not evidence against the firm, only a check we could not complete from this source
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 34 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint88 public client reviews and 27 years since its web address was registered in 2000
AProfessional Standing21/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 23.0 years since admission across 33 of 34 named attorneys (longest 52, shortest 0) · NYS Attorney Registration database9 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry33 of 34 named attorneys matched to the New York register; bar numbers published on the bios9 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of New York State Trial Lawyers Association, New York State Bar Association, Association of Trial Lawyers of America and 4 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which New York's advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience14/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved88 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.7 over 88 reviews → Bayesian 4.77 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle4 of 14 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-02) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 14 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 38 → 78th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 27.5) 2/3 · 1,072 referring domains, 75th pct 2/2 · 1,403 organic keywords / 12,666 visits·mo, 93th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness3/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: New York × Personal Injury (81 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
38· 77th percentile
1,072 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 1.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
4 / 4
blog · attorney bios · privacy policy · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 28
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-10Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Attorneys 33 attorneys · every licence checked against the New York attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
BJ
Beth N. JablonAdmitted in NY
VC
Vito A. CannavoAdmitted in NY
NP
Nicholas PapainAdmitted in NY
JT
John M. TomskyAdmitted in NY
JN
John F. NashAdmitted in NY
FF
Frank V. FlorianiAdmitted in NY
ES
Eric K. SchwarzAdmitted in NY
EC
Eleni CoffinasAdmitted in NY
BS
Brian J. ShootAdmitted in NY
AA
Albert B. AquilaAdmitted in NY
RS
Robert G. SullivanAdmitted in NY
AR
Abigail F. RafaelAdmitted in NY
MA
Mark A. ApostolosAdmitted in NY
EP
Eleni M. PapastefanouAdmitted in NY
NL
Nicole M. LaGregaAdmitted in NY
EM
Evgenia MallasAdmitted in NY
MP
Marvin PonceAdmitted in NY
JR
Joseph RozovskyAdmitted in NY
CD
Christopher J. DelliCarpiniAdmitted in NY
DG
Danielle M. GoldfingerAdmitted in NY
AT
Ana-Marija TurkovicAdmitted in NY
IP
Ina PecaniAdmitted in NY
GN
Glenn W. NickAdmitted in NY
EM
Elizabeth MontesanoAdmitted in NY
JD
Jessica P. DenningerAdmitted in NY
SM
Samantha M. MenicucciAdmitted in NY
HT
Hugh M. TurkAdmitted in NY
LR
Laura S. RaphaelAdmitted in NY
AV
Amber R. VolzAdmitted in NY
CS
Craig M. SilvermanAdmitted in NY
SG
Stephen C. GlasserAdmitted in NY
LM
Liza A. MilgrimAdmitted in NY
DC
Deanne M. CaputoAdmitted in NY
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.7
★★★★★
Based on 88 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 4 locations · main office: Manhattan
Manhattan120 Broadway 27th floor, New York, NY 10271, USA
Garden City1140 Franklin Ave #200, Garden City, NY 11530, USA
Cutchogue33105 Main Rd, Cutchogue, NY 11935, USA
Hackensack25 Main St #602, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo charge?
Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo offer a free consultation?
Yes. Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo have offices?
Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo publishes four offices, in Manhattan, Garden City, Cutchogue and Hackensack. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo?
Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo names 34 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. 33 of 34 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status. 1 could not be told apart from namesakes in the register and are counted neither way.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo?
Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo scores 53 and sits at Verified. Passed: licensure, discipline, website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.