- Home
- Houston, TX
- Personal Injury
- Sutliff & Stout
Sutliff & Stout
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 76Personal InjuryHouston, TX● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Sutliff & Stout
Sutliff & Stout works from Post Oak Boulevard in Houston, with offices in Austin and Cypress, and names 22 attorneys.
317 reviews at 4.91 across three listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes 31 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 76 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
317 client reviews
Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.91 average over 317 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
31 results published
Across 5 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
76out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 20262 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (90% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +3.0 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity on the Texas list of active franchise taxpayers. Texas does not require a sole proprietorship or a general partnership to pay franchise tax, and an exempt entity is left off as well, so this is a check this source cannot complete rather than evidence against the firm. The state's own SOSDirect service can settle it for a fee
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 16 named attorneys published, and 5 more people in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint317 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2007-05-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of State Bar of Texas, Texas Trial Lawyers Association, American Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes13/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted31 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted5 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved317 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.91 over 317 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle8 of 14 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-04) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 14 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority11/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pending · fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 56 → 97th pct of 74-firm cohort (median 19) 3/3 · 2,407 referring domains, 96th pct 2/2 · 1,380 organic keywords / 9,772 visits·mo, 94th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Houston Personal Injury (100 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
56· 72th percentile
2,407 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 0.4M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · blog · fee statement
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Not measuredmobile
PageSpeed Insights measurement pending
PendingPractice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Sutliff & Stout lists 31 case results on its own website, across 5 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckwrongful deathpedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 14 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Texas attorney register · 2 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys · 5 people are named in a role that is not a lawyer’s
NH
Natisha HalesPersonal Injury Attorney
HS
Hank StoutCo-Founder
GS
Graham E. SutliffCo-Founder
JP
Jaime PerezAttorney
KW
Kelly M. WalneAttorney
MP
Matthew PloegerAttorney
GC
Galveston CarAccident Attorney
MC
Missouri City CarAccident Attorney
BC
Baytown CarAccident Attorney
CC
Cypress CarAccident Attorney
CC
Conroe CarAccident Attorney
LC
League City CarAccident Attorney
SC
Sugar Land CarAccident Attorney
PC
Pearland CarAccident Attorney
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s
The firm names these people among its team and prints the role below beside the names. They are not counted as attorneys.
- Katy Easley Paralegal
- Jenna Brooks Paralegal
- Jeannette Acosta Paralegal
- Andrea Reyes Paralegal
- Monica Veer Paralegal
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 317 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Houston
Houston550 Post Oak Blvd #530, Houston, TX 77027, USA
Austin Car Accident and Personal Injury Lawyers9433 Bee Caves Rd Bldg III Suite 200, Austin, TX 78733, USA
Cypress Car Accident and Personal Injury Lawyers17302 House Hahl Rd Ste 210, Cypress, TX 77433, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Sutliff & Stout charge?
Sutliff & Stout publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Sutliff & Stout offer a free consultation?
Yes. Sutliff & Stout publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Sutliff & Stout have offices?
Sutliff & Stout publishes three offices, in Houston, Austin and Cypress. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Sutliff & Stout?
Sutliff & Stout names 22 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Sutliff & Stout publishes verified?
No. Sutliff & Stout publishes 31 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Sutliff & Stout?
Sutliff & Stout scores 74 and sits at Certified. Passed: website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.