1. Home
  2. San Diego, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. The Law Brothers

The Law Brothers

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 815 Google reviews3 offices18 attorneysEnglish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
6Practice areas

About The Law Brothers

The Law Brothers works from U.S. Route 66 8370 in Beverly Hills, with offices in San Diego and Sacramento, and names 18 attorneys.

815 reviews at 4.86 across three listings. A free consultation and a 24 hour line, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 12 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

815 client reviews

Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.86 average over 815 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

42out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
23 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (44% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · B1 Results published: +6 available · A2 Experience: +5 available
G1 Licensure12 of 18 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 6 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 12 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 18 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint815 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2006-10-10, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
8/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 7.4 years since admission across 12 of 18 named attorneys (longest 18, shortest 1) · NYS Attorney Registration database5 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry12 of 18 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved815 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.86 over 815 reviews → Bayesian 4.86 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle6 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-07) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 16 → 51th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 1,108 referring domains, 60th pct 1/2 · 204 organic keywords / 1,810 visits·mo, 74th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 7 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.7 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
4/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
16· 50th percentile
1,108 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 11.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · blog · disclaimer
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 45
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-29

Attorneys 12 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 6 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

DA
David AngeloffAdmitted in NY
RB
Ryan BlakeAdmitted in NY
EE
Esteban Espinosa-UlloaAdmitted in NY
MG
Madeline GharabaghAdmitted in NY
CG
Caitlin GreggAdmitted in NY
CH
Chantal HakakeyanAdmitted in NY
SL
Shawn LalezaryAdmitted in NY
SL
Shervin LalezaryAdmitted in NY
JM
Janine MitchellAdmitted in NY
CP
Cameron PariAdmitted in NY
AT
Amber TerryAdmitted in NY
AY
Andrew YepAdmitted in NY

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 815 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 3 locations · main office: Beverly Hills

Beverly Hills90211 U.S. Route 66 8370 unit 205, Beverly Hills, CA 90210, USA
San Diego402 W Broadway Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92101, USA
Sacramento3626 Fair Oaks Blvd Ste 186, Sacramento, CA 95864, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does The Law Brothers charge?
The Law Brothers publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does The Law Brothers offer a free consultation?
Yes. The Law Brothers publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does The Law Brothers have offices?
The Law Brothers publishes three offices, in Beverly Hills, San Diego and Sacramento. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at The Law Brothers?
The Law Brothers names 18 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about The Law Brothers?
The Law Brothers scores 40 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.