- Home
- San Diego, CA
- Personal Injury
- The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC
The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 66Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
Hospital& home visits
2Practice areas
About The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC
The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC works from Turquoise Street and names ten attorneys.
658 reviews at 4.9. Contingency fees, a free consultation and hospital and home visits, published. It publishes eleven case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 66 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
No public discipline
No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
658 client reviews
Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.9 average over 658 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
66out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar D (8/25).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 202612 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (76% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · E3 Languages & accessibility: +4.0 available · A2 Experience: +3 available
G1 Licensure2 of 10 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 8 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 3 named attorneys published, and 7 more people in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint658 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2012-09-05, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing13/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 12.0 years since admission across 2 of 3 named attorneys (longest 17, shortest 7) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry2 of 3 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted11 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted4 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved658 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 658 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-05) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pending · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 17 → 53th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 1,273 referring domains, 70th pct 1/2 · 463 organic keywords / 1,197 visits·mo, 79th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 3 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.3 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedHospital & home visits2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
17· 51th percentile
1,273 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 10.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Not measuredmobile
PageSpeed Insights measurement pending
PendingPractice areas 2 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC lists 11 case results on its own website, across 4 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehiclepremiseswrongful deathproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 2 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys · 7 people are named in a role that is not a lawyer’s
PM
Paul MankinFounding Attorney
JR
Joseph RoccoPartner
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s
The firm names these people among its team and prints the role below beside the names. They are not counted as attorneys.
- Monique Petro Operations Manager
- Gustavo Fiorelli Chief Technology Officer
- Stefanie Lawley Senior Paralegal
- Rayanne Mankin Case Manager
- Bruna Saltiel Marketing & Case Manager
- Josef Clemente Medical Records Specialist
- Gueenlie Albarico Receptionist
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 658 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: San Diego
San Diego1010 Turquoise St Unit 320, San Diego, CA 92109, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC charge?
The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC offer a free consultation?
Yes. The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC publishes a free initial consultation. The firm states it will visit clients in hospital or at home.
Where does The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC have offices?
The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC publishes one office, in San Diego. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC?
The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC names ten attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC publishes verified?
No. The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC publishes eleven case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC?
The Law Office of Paul Mankin, APC scores 68 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.