- Home
- Los Angeles, CA
- Personal Injury
- The Reeves Law Group
The Reeves Law Group
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
PaidInitial consultation
24/7intake line
Hospital& home visits
4Practice areas
About The Reeves Law Group
The Reeves Law Group is a personal injury firm with offices in Orange and Los Angeles.
The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; its intake line is open around the clock; it will visit clients in hospital or at home.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 1 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
37 years average at the bar
Mean 37.0 years since admission across 1 of 2 named attorneys (longest 37, shortest 37) · NYS Attorney Registration database
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
52out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: A; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 202613 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (49% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available
G1 Licensure1 of 2 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 1 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 1 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 2 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint100 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2005-03-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing16/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 37.0 years since admission across 1 of 2 named attorneys (longest 37, shortest 37) · NYS Attorney Registration database10 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry1 of 2 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience12/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved100 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.68 over 100 reviews → Bayesian 4.75 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2024-06-12) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review1 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 38.0 → 89th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 3/3 · 1,788 referring domains, 89th pct 2/2 · 401 organic keywords / 4,091 visits·mo, 90th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedContingency · the fee percentage itself is not published2 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line · Hospital & home visits5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
38· 88th percentile
1,788 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 2.0M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19Trust pages
2 / 2
disclaimer · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 69
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12Practice areas 4 areas · primary focus highlighted
Attorneys 1 attorney · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
DP
Derek PakizAdmitted in CA
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.7
★★★★★
Based on 100 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: Orange
Orange333 City Blvd W ste 1711, Orange, CA 92868, USA
Los Angeles1055 W 7th St #3333, Los Angeles, CA 90017, USA