1. Home
  2. Atlanta, GA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. The Roth Firm

The Roth Firm

ListedPersonal InjuryAtlanta, GA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 1,375 Google reviews2 offices17 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
7Practice areas

About The Roth Firm

The Roth Firm works from Powers Ferry Road Northwest in Atlanta, with a second office in Nashville, and names 17 attorneys.

1,375 reviews at 4.82 across two listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes 42 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 662 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Georgia on the discipline of State Bar of Georgia members, 1979 to 2026. 4 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

1,375 client reviews

Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.82 average over 1,375 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

42 results published

Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

59out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Georgia does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Listed

1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

6 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (74% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by GAGeorgia does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 662 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Georgia on the discipline of State Bar of Georgia members, 1979 to 2026. 4 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by GA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Georgia publishes no business register we can query for free. The Secretary of State sells the bulk corporations file over FTP, $500 for a single extract or $5,000 a year for weekly ones, and its free entity search answers an automated reader with a 403 on every path including its own robots file, which is a bot challenge we do not work around. A register that is for sale is a published record in the sense that matters here only if somebody buys it. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 16 named attorneys published, and 1 more person in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 FootprintNot checked1,375 public reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum; time in operation still to confirm
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceGeorgia publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceGeorgia publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted42 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved1,375 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.82 over 1,375 reviews → Bayesian 4.82 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle10 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-04) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
5/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pending · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 17 → 30th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 24) 1/3 · 574 referring domains, 4th pct 0/2 · 427 organic keywords / 1,701 visits·mo, 78th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 7 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.7 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26no JSON-LD detected 0/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)0 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Atlanta Personal Injury (100 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
17· 24th percentile
574 ref. domains · cohort median 27.5 · Ahrefs rank 10.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
2 / 2
blog · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Not measuredmobile
PageSpeed Insights measurement pending
Pending

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

The Roth Firm lists 42 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 2 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Georgia attorney register · 14 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys · 1 person is named in a role that is not a lawyer’s

JR
James M. RothManaging Partner
KR
Keri Mason RothManaging Partner

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s

The firm names this person among its team and prints the role below beside the name. They are not counted as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 1,375 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Atlanta

Atlanta6120 Powers Ferry Rd NW Ste 630, Atlanta, GA 30339, USA
Nashville402 Bna Dr Building 100 Suite 410, Nashville, TN 37217, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does The Roth Firm charge?
The Roth Firm publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does The Roth Firm offer a free consultation?
Yes. The Roth Firm publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does The Roth Firm have offices?
The Roth Firm publishes two offices, in Atlanta and Nashville. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at The Roth Firm?
The Roth Firm names 17 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Georgia does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results The Roth Firm publishes verified?
No. The Roth Firm publishes 42 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about The Roth Firm?
The Roth Firm scores 57 and sits at Listed. Passed: discipline and website. Did not pass: footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.