1. Home
  2. Northwest Indiana, IN
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Theodoros & Rooth, P.C.

Theodoros & Rooth, P.C.

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryNorthwest Indiana, IN● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.6 · 48 Google reviews1 office4 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
1Practice areas

About Theodoros & Rooth

Theodoros & Rooth has represented injured people from Merrillville since 1988 and publishes four attorneys, two of whom share a name across two generations.

It offers free consultations and 24 hour availability, says it has more than 50 combined years of experience, and discusses contingency fees as one of the things that decides what a case costs without stating its own rate. It publishes no case results we could read.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 301 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Indiana on the discipline of Indiana attorneys, 1960 to 2026. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

47out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Indiana does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (58% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by INIndiana does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 301 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Indiana on the discipline of Indiana attorneys, 1960 to 2026. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by IN1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Indiana publishes no business register we can query. INBiz answers an automated reader with a 403 and the Secretary of State's business search answers with a 202 and an empty body, which is a bot challenge, and we do not work around either. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 4 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint48 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2006-08-17, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceIndiana publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Bar Association, American Association for Justice · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
4/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted1 result published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts1 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience
15/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved48 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.6 over 48 reviews → Bayesian 4.75 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-02-23) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
9/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pending · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 27 → 83th pct of 12-firm cohort (median 8) 2/3 · 712 referring domains, 83th pct 2/2 · 80 organic keywords / 604 visits·mo, 54th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness
6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Northwest Indiana x Personal Injury (13 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
27· 83th percentile
712 ref. domains · cohort median 8 · Ahrefs rank 5.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
4 / 4
disclaimer · privacy policy · attorney bios · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Not measuredmobile
PageSpeed Insights measurement pending
Pending

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Theodoros & Rooth, P.C. lists 1 case result on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 4 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

  • William Theodoros
  • Perry W. Theodoros
  • Barry D. Rooth
  • William A. Theodoros

Client reviews

4.6
★★★★★
Based on 48 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Merrillville

Merrillville8750 Broadway #A, Merrillville, IN 46410, USA