- Home
- Chicago, IL
- Personal Injury
- Thomas Law Offices
Thomas Law Offices
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 68Personal InjuryChicago, IL● Accepting new clients
Contingency
How much do you charge?
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Thomas Law Offices
Thomas Law Offices works from five offices across Kentucky, Illinois, Ohio and Missouri, and names 24 attorneys.
223 reviews at 4.92 across five listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published. It publishes 17 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 68 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
4.92 average over 223 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
How much do you charge?
17 results published
Across 7 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
68out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Illinois does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 202610 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (75% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by ILIllinois does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by ILIllinois does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by IL5 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Illinois publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 24 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint223 public client reviews across 5 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2010-10-22, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceIllinois publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceIllinois publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice, American Bar Association, Association of Trial Lawyers of America and 4 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes8/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted17 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved223 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.92 over 223 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle17 of 23 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-07) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 23 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 37 → 84th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 18) 3/3 · 2,167 referring domains, 92th pct 2/2 · 397 organic keywords / 1,822 visits·mo, 74th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle5 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness8/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “How much do you charge?” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Chicago Personal Injury (110 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
37· 84th percentile
2,167 ref. domains · cohort median 18 · Ahrefs rank 2.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26Trust pages
4 / 4
privacy policy · disclaimer · attorney bios · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 85
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Thomas Law Offices lists 17 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 23 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Illinois attorney register
SM
Sarah MustianAttorney
SC
Shawn CantleyPartner
DB
David BarberPartner
JS
Joseph SpinuzzaAttorney
KK
Kelly KingAttorney
TG
Terry GaffneyAttorney
CG
Cameryn GonnellaAttorney
AA
Ashley AbarayPartner
TT
Tad ThomasManaging Partner
NH
Nick HorneAttorney
NH
Nick HaynesPartner
KW
Kevin WeisPartner
AC
Alex CassellAttorney
RP
Ron ParryPartner
BJ
Brian JasperPartner
JA
Julie Pahler AndersonAttorney
LL
Lindsy LopezPartner and General Counsel
LS
Lou SchneiderPartner
BM
Bo McNultyPartner
MC
Mike CampbellPartner
NT
Nick ThompsonAttorney
AE
Alex ErnstAttorney
EK
Eric KiserAttorney
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 223 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 5 locations · main office: Prospect
Prospect9418 Norton Commons Blvd #200, Prospect, KY 40059, USA
Chicago1 S Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60603, USA
Cleveland3401 Enterprise Parkwy Ste 330, Cleveland, OH 44122, USA
Cincinnati250 E 5th St #710, Cincinnati, OH 45202, USA
Columbia308 S 9th St ste 115 m, Columbia, MO 65201, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Thomas Law Offices charge?
Thomas Law Offices publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Thomas Law Offices offer a free consultation?
Yes. Thomas Law Offices publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Thomas Law Offices have offices?
Thomas Law Offices publishes five offices, in Prospect, Chicago, Cleveland, Cincinnati and Columbia. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Thomas Law Offices?
Thomas Law Offices names 24 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Illinois does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Thomas Law Offices publishes verified?
No. Thomas Law Offices publishes 17 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Thomas Law Offices?
Thomas Law Offices scores 66 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.