1. Home
  2. Chicago, IL
  3. Personal Injury
  4. TorHoerman Law

TorHoerman Law

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryChicago, IL● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 132 Google reviews2 offices19 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
7Practice areas

About TorHoerman Law

TorHoerman Law works from West Wacker Drive in Chicago, with a second office in Marietta, and names 19 attorneys.

132 reviews at 5.0 across two listings. Contingency fees and a free consultation, published. It publishes eleven case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

5 average over 132 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

11 results published

Across 9 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

61out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Illinois does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

LFL Verified 2026
4 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (75% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · E4 Availability: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by ILIllinois does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by ILIllinois does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by IL2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Illinois publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 10 named attorneys published, and 9 more people in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint132 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2009-04-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceIllinois publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceIllinois publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice, American Bar Association, State Bar of Texas · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted11 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted9 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
14/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved132 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 132 reviews → Bayesian 4.92 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle1 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-04-14) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review1 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 74 → 100th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 18) 3/3 · 10,250 referring domains, 100th pct 2/2 · 6,092 organic keywords / 55,644 visits·mo, 100th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
3/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Chicago Personal Injury (110 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
74· 100th percentile
10,250 ref. domains · cohort median 18 · Ahrefs rank 0.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · disclaimer · attorney bios
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 27
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

TorHoerman Law lists 11 case results on its own website, across 9 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 1 attorney · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Illinois attorney register · 9 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys · 9 people are named in a role that is not a lawyer’s

SM
St. Louis MedicalMalpractice Attorney

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s

The firm names these people among its team and prints the role below beside the names. They are not counted as attorneys.

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 132 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Chicago

Chicago55 W Wacker Dr 9th floor ste 8, Chicago, IL 60601, USA
Marietta171 Village Pkwy NE Bldg 8, Marietta, GA 30067, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does TorHoerman Law charge?
TorHoerman Law publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does TorHoerman Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. TorHoerman Law publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does TorHoerman Law have offices?
TorHoerman Law publishes two offices, in Chicago and Marietta. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at TorHoerman Law?
TorHoerman Law names 19 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Illinois does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results TorHoerman Law publishes verified?
No. TorHoerman Law publishes eleven case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about TorHoerman Law?
TorHoerman Law scores 59 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.