1. Home
  2. Atlanta, GA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Van Sant Law

Van Sant Law

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryAtlanta, GA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 491 Google reviews6 offices5 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
Hospital& home visits
7Practice areas

About Van Sant Law

Van Sant Law works from six offices across Georgia, among them Atlanta, Cumming and Alpharetta, and names five attorneys.

491 reviews at 4.97 across six listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line, hospital and home visits and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes 39 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

491 client reviews

Counted across 6 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.97 average over 491 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

39 results published

Across 5 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

63out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Georgia does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
2 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (67% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by GAGeorgia does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by GA1 of the firm's attorneys share a surname with a disciplined attorney, and for R. Shannon Carpenter 1 of 1 decision(s) naming this surname have no searchable text, so they can be neither tied to nor ruled out against this attorney. The decisions that cannot be read are scans without searchable text, so this is a limit of the published record. Nothing here says the firm's attorney is that person.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by GA6 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Georgia publishes no business register we can query for free. The Secretary of State sells the bulk corporations file over FTP, $500 for a single extract or $5,000 a year for weekly ones, and its free entity search answers an automated reader with a 403 on every path including its own robots file, which is a bot challenge we do not work around. A register that is for sale is a published record in the sense that matters here only if somebody buys it. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 5 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint491 public client reviews across 6 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2009-02-04, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceGeorgia publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceGeorgia publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted39 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted5 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved491 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 6 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.97 over 491 reviews → Bayesian 4.95 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle6 of 27 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-23) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 27 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 36 → 82th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 24) 2/3 · 1,337 referring domains, 66th pct 1/2 · 162 organic keywords / 606 visits·mo, 56th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle6 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
10/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line · Hospital & home visits5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Atlanta Personal Injury (100 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
36· 65th percentile
1,337 ref. domains · cohort median 27.5 · Ahrefs rank 2.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
4 / 4
privacy policy · disclaimer · attorney bios · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 94
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-25

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Van Sant Law lists 39 case results on its own website, across 5 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathpedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 5 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 491 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 6 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 6 locations · main office: Atlanta

Atlanta307 14th St NW #100, Atlanta, GA 30318, USA
Cumming123 Tribble Gap Rd #100, Cumming, GA 30040, USA
Alpharetta11175 Cicero Dr Suite #100-A, Alpharetta, GA 30022, USA
Duluth3675 Crestwood Pkwy NW #400a, Duluth, GA 30096, USA
Lawrenceville113 S Perry St Ste 205, Lawrenceville, GA 30046, USA
Gainesville311 Green St Ste 400, Gainesville, GA 30501, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Van Sant Law charge?
Van Sant Law publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Van Sant Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. Van Sant Law publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock, the firm states it will visit clients in hospital or at home and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Van Sant Law have offices?
Van Sant Law publishes six offices, among them Atlanta, Cumming, Alpharetta and Duluth. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Van Sant Law?
Van Sant Law names five attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Georgia does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Van Sant Law publishes verified?
No. Van Sant Law publishes 39 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Van Sant Law?
Van Sant Law scores 61 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.