1. Home
  2. Phoenix, AZ
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Verderame Law Group

Verderame Law Group

LFL Certified 2026 · Score 65Personal InjuryPhoenix, AZ● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 101 Google reviews3 offices5 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyBecause we take cases on a contingency fee basis, our clients do not pay if we don’t win.
FreeInitial consultation
8Practice areas

About Verderame Law Group

Verderame Law Group works from East Flower Street in Phoenix, with a second office in Tempe, and names five attorneys.

101 reviews at 4.91 across three listings. Contingency fees and a free consultation, published. It publishes 53 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Certified 2026

Scored 65 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.

4.91 average over 101 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Fee terms published

Because we take cases on a contingency fee basis, our clients do not pay if we don’t win.

53 results published

Across 9 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

65out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Arizona does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

LFL Certified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 2026
13 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (90% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by AZArizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by AZArizona does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by AZ3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Arizona publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 5 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint101 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2003-05-12, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice, Association of Trial Lawyers of America, American Board of Trial Advocates and 2 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
15/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted53 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted9 case types named; 1 court or county reference5 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved101 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.91 over 101 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 12 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-19) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 12 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
5/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 10 → 39th pct of 100-firm cohort (median 16) 1/3 · 770 referring domains, 7th pct 0/2 · 13 organic keywords / 46 visits·mo, 28th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
5/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “Because we take cases on a contingency fee basis, our clients do not pay if we don’t win.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Phoenix Personal Injury (101 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
10· 39th percentile
770 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 17.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
2 / 2
attorney bios · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 78
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Verderame Law Group lists 53 case results on its own website, across 9 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 4 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Arizona attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

RP
Richard S. PlattnerOf Counsel
NV
Nick VerderamePartner
PK
Paul E. KingAssociate Attorney
FV
Frank VerderamePartner

Also named by the firm

The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 101 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 3 locations · main office: Phoenix

Phoenix316 E Flower St, Phoenix, AZ 85012, USA
Tempe5500 S Lakeshore Dr, Tempe, AZ 85283, USA
Frank Verderame, Esq316 E Flower St, Phoenix, AZ 85012, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Verderame Law Group charge?
Verderame Law Group publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Verderame Law Group offer a free consultation?
Yes. Verderame Law Group publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Verderame Law Group have offices?
Verderame Law Group publishes three offices, among them Phoenix and Tempe. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Verderame Law Group?
Verderame Law Group names five attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Arizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Verderame Law Group publishes verified?
No. Verderame Law Group publishes 53 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Verderame Law Group?
Verderame Law Group scores 63 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.