1. Home
  2. San Diego, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Walton Injury Law

Walton Injury Law

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 131 Google reviews3 offices5 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
7Practice areas

About Walton Injury Law

Walton Injury Law works from High Bluff Drive in San Diego, with offices in Bellingham and Murrieta, and names six attorneys.

131 reviews at 5.0 across three listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 3 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

5 average over 131 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

20 years average at the bar

Mean 19.7 years since admission across 3 of 3 named attorneys (longest 23, shortest 14) · NYS Attorney Registration database

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

57out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
8 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (63% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +5 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 Licensure3 of 6 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 3 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 3 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 3 named attorneys published, and 3 more people in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint131 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2024-06-12, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
18/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 19.7 years since admission across 3 of 3 named attorneys (longest 23, shortest 14) · NYS Attorney Registration database9 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry3 of 3 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio6 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved131 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 131 reviews → Bayesian 4.92 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle10 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-23) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 13 → 47th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 1/3 · 1,542 referring domains, 83th pct 2/2 · 25 organic keywords / 95 visits·mo, 38th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
13· 46th percentile
1,542 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 14.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
4 / 4
disclaimer · attorney bios · blog · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 59
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30

Attorneys 3 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 2 people are named in a role that is not a lawyer’s

CL
Candace T. LamTrial Attorney
CW
Christopher C. WaltonManaging Partner
BN
Brian NeedelmanTrial Attorney

Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s

The firm names these people among its team and prints the role below beside the names. They are not counted as attorneys.

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 131 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 3 locations · main office: San Diego

San Diego12555 High Bluff Dr Ste 333, San Diego, CA 92130, USA
Bellingham2219 Rimland Dr Ste 301, Bellingham, WA 98226, USA
Murrieta26636 Margarita Rd #100, Murrieta, CA 92563, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Walton Injury Law charge?
Walton Injury Law publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Walton Injury Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. Walton Injury Law publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Walton Injury Law have offices?
Walton Injury Law publishes three offices, in San Diego, Bellingham and Murrieta. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Walton Injury Law?
Walton Injury Law names six attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Walton Injury Law?
Walton Injury Law scores 49 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.