1. Home
  2. Philadelphia, PA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Wapner Newman

Wapner Newman

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhiladelphia, PA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.7 · 225 Google reviews1 office19 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
6Practice areas

About Wapner Newman

Wapner Newman works from John F Kennedy Boulevard and names 22 attorneys.

225 reviews at 4.7. Contingency fees and a free consultation, published. It publishes 41 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on the discipline of members of the Pennsylvania bar, prosecuted by its Disciplinary Board, 1976 to 2019. 2 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

4.7 average over 225 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

41 results published

Across 9 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

62out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Pennsylvania does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

LFL Verified 2026
3 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (76% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · E4 Availability: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by PAPennsylvania does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on the discipline of members of the Pennsylvania bar, prosecuted by its Disciplinary Board, 1976 to 2019. 2 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by PA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Pennsylvania publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 22 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint225 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2015-05-19, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourcePennsylvania publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourcePennsylvania publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice, Association of Trial Lawyers of America · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted41 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted9 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved225 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.7 over 225 reviews → Bayesian 4.74 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-26) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 37 → 84th pct of 73-firm cohort (median 19) 3/3 · 1,772 referring domains, 89th pct 2/2 · 150 organic keywords / 670 visits·mo, 60th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
3/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Philadelphia Personal Injury (74 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
37· 84th percentile
1,772 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 2.2M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
4 / 4
blog · attorney bios · privacy policy · disclaimer
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 75
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Wapner Newman lists 41 case results on its own website, across 9 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 13 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Pennsylvania attorney register · 6 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

MB
Marc G. BrecherAttorney
AG
Adam S. GetsonAttorney
JB
Julianna Merback BurdoAttorney
RC
Ramsey H. ChewIii Associate
SH
Simon T. HaileabAttorney
SB
Steven T. BrecherAssociate
DS
David E. SternbergAttorney
SJ
Samuel A. Anyan JrAttorney
PM
Patrick MurphyAttorney
LE
Leah M. EdelsteinAssociate
RM
Robert S. MillerAttorney
JS
Jarad L. SilversteinAttorney
NM
Nathan MurawskyAttorney

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.7
★★★★★
Based on 225 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Philadelphia

Philadelphia1628 John F Kennedy Blvd #800, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Wapner Newman charge?
Wapner Newman publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Wapner Newman offer a free consultation?
Yes. Wapner Newman publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Wapner Newman have offices?
Wapner Newman publishes one office, in Philadelphia. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Wapner Newman?
Wapner Newman names 22 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Pennsylvania does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Wapner Newman publishes verified?
No. Wapner Newman publishes 41 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Wapner Newman?
Wapner Newman scores 60 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.