1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. WIN Injury & Accident Trial Lawyers PC

WIN Injury & Accident Trial Lawyers PC

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 150 Google reviews2 offices4 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
6Practice areas

About WIN Injury & Accident Trial Lawyers

WIN Injury & Accident Trial Lawyers PC is a personal injury firm with offices in Pasadena and Pomona.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 4 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

5 average over 150 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

54out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 72 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar B in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (70% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: not yet measured (6 pts) · B2 Specificity: not yet measured (5 pts) · B3 Results disclosure: not yet measured (4 pts)
G1 Licensure4 of 5 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 1 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 4 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 5 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint150 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2021-11-09, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
13/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 10.0 years since admission across 4 of 4 named attorneys (longest 22, shortest 2) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry4 of 4 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio6 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedPendingthe results page served 2564 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 6
B2 SpecificityPendingthe results page served 2564 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 5
B3 Results disclosurePendingthe results page served 2564 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved150 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 150 reviews → Bayesian 4.93 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle2 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-26) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 14.0 → 52th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 2/3 · 968 referring domains, 24th pct 0/2 · 79 organic keywords / 300 visits·mo, 60th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
3/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
14· 52th percentile
968 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 13.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · attorney bios · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 71
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Attorneys 4 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register

RB
Rony BarsoumAdmitted in CA
JE
Jameson EvansAdmitted in CA
AT
Amanda ThompsonAdmitted in CA
BT
Ben TwiskAdmitted in CA

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 150 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Pasadena

Pasadena1 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 200, Pasadena, CA 91105, USA
WIN Injury & Accident Trial Lawyers Accident & Workers Comp Lawyers2655 Pine St #230, Pomona, CA 91767, USA