- Home
- Northwest Indiana, IN
- Personal Injury
- Wruck Paupore PC
Wruck Paupore PC
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryNorthwest Indiana, IN● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Wruck Paupore
Wruck Paupore publishes three attorneys, two founding partners and one of counsel, and offices in Dyer, South Bend and West Lafayette, describing a practice that reaches Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin.
It calls its fee terms a Zero Fee Promise and runs a 24 hour helpline. It holds the highest review average of any firm in this market, 4.94 across 122 reviews, and it publishes no case results with amounts we could read.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 301 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Indiana on the discipline of Indiana attorneys, 1960 to 2026. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
4.94 average over 144 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
11 results published
Across 9 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
58out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Indiana does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Verified 20267 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (72% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by INIndiana does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 301 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Indiana on the discipline of Indiana attorneys, 1960 to 2026. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by IN3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Indiana publishes no business register we can query. INBiz answers an automated reader with a 403 and the Secretary of State's business search answers with a 202 and an empty body, which is a bot challenge, and we do not work around either. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 3 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint122 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2006-06-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceIndiana publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceIndiana publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted11 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted9 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience13/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved144 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.94 over 144 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle1 of 25 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-02-02) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review1 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 25 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 22 → 67th pct of 12-firm cohort (median 8) 2/3 · 677 referring domains, 75th pct 2/2 · 112 organic keywords / 322 visits·mo, 54th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle5 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness4/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Northwest Indiana x Personal Injury (13 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
22· 67th percentile
677 ref. domains · cohort median 8 · Ahrefs rank 7.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 92
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Wruck Paupore PC lists 11 case results on its own website, across 9 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 3 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Indiana attorney register
DW
Don WruckFounding Partner
KM
Keith MedvedOf Counsel
JP
Jason PauporeFounding Partner
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 144 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Dyer
Dyer275 Joliet St #250, Dyer, IN 46311, USA
South Bend1251 N Eddy St #200, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
West Lafayette101 Foundry Dr Ste 1200, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Wruck Paupore charge?
Wruck Paupore publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Wruck Paupore offer a free consultation?
Yes. Wruck Paupore publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Wruck Paupore have offices?
Wruck Paupore publishes three offices, in Dyer, South Bend and West Lafayette. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Wruck Paupore?
Wruck Paupore names three attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Indiana does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Wruck Paupore publishes verified?
No. Wruck Paupore publishes eleven case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Wruck Paupore?
Wruck Paupore scores 56 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.