- Home
- San Antonio, TX
- Personal Injury
- Zinda Law Group, PLLC
Zinda Law Group, PLLC
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 68Personal InjurySan Antonio, TX● Accepting new clients
Contingency
Our firm also operates on a contingency basis – this means if we don’t win your case, you won’t owe us a dime.
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
7Practice areas
About Zinda Law Group
Zinda Law Group works from five offices across Texas, Arizona and Colorado, and names 21 attorneys.
1,205 reviews at 4.86 across five listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes three case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 68 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
1,205 client reviews
Counted across 5 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.86 average over 1,205 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
Our firm also operates on a contingency basis – this means if we don’t win your case, you won’t owe us a dime.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
68out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 202610 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (71% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity on the Texas list of active franchise taxpayers. Texas does not require a sole proprietorship or a general partnership to pay franchise tax, and an exempt entity is left off as well, so this is a check this source cannot complete rather than evidence against the firm. The state's own SOSDirect service can settle it for a fee
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 19 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint1,205 public client reviews across 5 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2013-01-14, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of The Florida Bar, State Bar of Texas, American Bar Association and 2 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes6/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted3 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted6 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved1,205 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.86 over 1,205 reviews → Bayesian 4.86 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle13 of 25 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-18) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 25 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 44 → 90th pct of 63-firm cohort (median 17.5) 3/3 · 3,698 referring domains, 98th pct 2/2 · 1,564 organic keywords / 15,178 visits·mo, 95th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle5 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness9/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “Our firm also operates on a contingency basis – this means if we don’t win your case, you won’t owe us a dime.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Antonio Personal Injury (64 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
44· 90th percentile
3,698 ref. domains · cohort median 17.5 · Ahrefs rank 1.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
3 / 3
blog · attorney bios · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 42
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-29Practice areas 7 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Zinda Law Group, PLLC lists 3 case results on its own website, across 6 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplace
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 11 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Texas attorney register · 5 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
GR
Gianna RagonaAssociate Attorney
RA
Rudwin AyalaTrial Attorney
JW
Julia WittTrial Attorney
SA
Sameer AlzerAssociate Attorney
TG
Tadeo GilAssociate Attorney
FC
Frederick CabertoAssociate Attorney
MM
Max MasseyLead Trial Attorney
CG
Chelsea GummTrial Attorney
NS
Neil SolomonPartner
CB
Conor BrennanAssociate Attorney
CG
Cole GummPartner
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 1,205 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 5 locations · main office: Austin
Austin7801 N Capital of Texas Hwy #300, Austin, TX 78731, USA
Phoenix11201 N Tatum Blvd #300, Phoenix, AZ 85028, USA
El Paso2300 George Dieter Dr, El Paso, TX 79936, USA
San Antonio18756 Stone Oak Pkwy STE. 200, San Antonio, TX 78258, USA
Colorado Springs102 S Tejon St #1100, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Zinda Law Group charge?
Zinda Law Group publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Zinda Law Group offer a free consultation?
Yes. Zinda Law Group publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Zinda Law Group have offices?
Zinda Law Group publishes five offices, in Austin, Phoenix, El Paso, San Antonio and Colorado Springs. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Zinda Law Group?
Zinda Law Group names 21 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Zinda Law Group publishes verified?
No. Zinda Law Group publishes three case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Zinda Law Group?
Zinda Law Group scores 66 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.